Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · July 9, 2021

Email alleging money laundering and SEC obstruction in shell-stock trading, July 2021

Email from a private correspondent forwarding a federal penalty announcement and alleging illegal naked shorting, money laundering shells, and SEC obstruction of his claims.Machine-written summary

EFTA00070411

FinCEN Assesses $14.5 Million Penalty against UBS Financial Services for Anti-Money Laundering Failures | FinCEN.gov

WASHINGTON—The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) today announced an assessment against UBS Financial Services, Inc. (UBSFS) for willful violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).. FinCEN assessed a $14.5 million civil money penalty, of which $5 million will be paid to the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the remainder will be concurrent with penalties for similar or related …

www.fincen.gov

The blatant, and egregious disregard by NITE/UBSS at al in trading billions of shares of sham companies with no products, nothing but losses, reverse merger,repeat explained: illegal naked shorting facilitates ALL of it. Very profitable. Virtually riskless. Further, as I ask in my information: WHEN would NITE,UBSS, CDEL etc file a SAR? BEFORE or AFTER trading billions of shares???? There ARE NO SAR’s. This also would fall under the jurisdiction of Kevin Goodman. This is the IRS TCR: money laundering/tax evasion related to this illegal naked shorting. In it, I discuss the Economic Substance Theory. WHY do sophisticated investors like the ones I have detailed extensively bother “investing” in these sham companies?? Take Mr Goodman’s et al Parallax “Covid complaint” and the OTHER sham shells I detail below. In fact, take the SEC OWN WORDS in the Parallax complaint: Parallax had no products AND no money in Early 2020 when Arena/Bradly made their bogus claims. What did they have? The same thing I detail in my extensive correspondence: ALL of these money laundering shells have worthless certificates. Usually converted from bogus, fictitious promissory notes. Then dumped on the public by a WILLING executing BD/MM like NITE,UBSS,CDEL etc. AND, converted into real money. The BD/MM are compensated in the form of illegal naked shorting trading profits. This is and always has been the core business at NITE et al. Unfortunately: the effects of which are sitting on the NITE balance sheet as we speak.

This is why my claims have been criminally obstructed by the SEC. The SEC has REPEATEDLY bailed out a known criminal enterprise. This is why Goodman produced the bullshit “order handling” complaint almost 6 months after I sent him my TCR in July 2015. This is why ALL of the related entities are omitted in his Parallax complaint. The SEC admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them.

In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader?

To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax S1: June 2019 with sellers I detailed below. Yet, in early 2020, the SEC acknowledges Parallax had no money to support their “new product” claims. HOW CAN THIS BE? As with hundreds of money laundering shells/NITE/UBSS et al top traded: These sophisticated investors are NOT “investing”. They are LAUNDERING.

And with bullshit “order handling”, “front running”, stand alone “P&D” (per my TCR: just a tool used to facilitate the laundering/naked shorting), “market access”, “Covid disclosures”, etc etc complaints, the SEC guarantees the activity will continue.

It does in July 2021.

Cheers!

Chris

From: Chris Dilorio <

Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 5:50 AM