EFTA00070362¶
Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix¶
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:50:20 +0000¶
| Attachments: | KCG_Appendix_3-20_13_penultimate.docx; KCG_TCR_3-20-13-penultimate_draft.pdf; KCG_TCR_3-20-13-penultimate_draft.docx; KCG_Appendix_3-20_13_penultimate.pdf; kcg1q2015.pdf; IMDS2012shareincrease.pdf; IMDS2013authshareinc.pdf; IMDS2014offering.pdf; IMDSShareincrease2017.pdf; IMDSshareincJune282018.pdf; IMDSdecauthorizedJuly122018.pdf |
SDNY et al Judges,¶
I don’t remember exactly what I was doing on September 18, 2020. But I can say with confidence that September 18, 2020 was a day like all other days consisting of 24 consecutive hours. My experience with the SEC suggests that the SEC begins it’s day around 8 am and calls it quits at roughly 6 pm. A 10 hour day. So let’s de construct the MEMX request for and the same day SEC response granting exemptions for their “anonymous agency only members only exchange” from complying with Rule 10b-10 of the 1934 Exchange Act. A reminder for the SEC DoJ et al: the 1934 Act are SECURITIES LAWS. 10b-10 specifically relates to written confirms for trade execution. These confirms also provide a “paper trail” should the SEC actually be interested in detecting illegal activity. OR infact: EXACTLY what the SEC SHOULD be doing in executing their mandate to protect the investing public and ENFORCE securities LAWS.¶
So, this request from MEMX: NITE,CDEL, UBSS et al shows up at SEC DC HQ sometime on September 18 2020. Within HOURS, the SEC had thoroughly reviewed the request. Analyzing at the Commission level the implications of this request to exempt MEMX from complying with Rule 10b-10. Of course, the Commission analyzed the request from the standpoint of executing its mandate to protect the public as is evidenced in their response granting approval as “being in the public interest”. ALL in a matter of a few hours. Is there a record of the Emergency meeting this request would have triggered? What was the Commission level vote in approving this request by MEMX?¶
SDNY Judges et al, Your Honors should feel HONORED that you too, like me, are potentially being stonewalled by corrupt SEC attorneys. See, as I have been waiting almost a year and a half to receive a final determination in the referenced Opco action here only after waiting 5 years to receive my Preliminary determination from the grossly corrupt Norberg, Pasquinelli et al, where yet to be enacted “Summary disposition” language was used. Yes, the Summary Disposition Rule” aka Christopher J Dilorio rule was created by the grossly corrupt SEC to SCREW whistleblowers who catch them in facilitating multiple, massive, ongoing frauds on the public it is mandated to protect and not EXPEDITE the Award process. But KNOWN criminals:MEMX can ask for and receive exemption from complying with Securities LAWS in their blatant fraud “anonymous agency” members only exchange in iust a few hours.¶
SDNY Judges et al: welcome to the Club. We have jackets.¶
As is irrefutably clear: ONLY THE CRIMINALS WHO OWN THE SEC RECEIVE EXPEDITED TREATMENT.¶
MEMX 10b-10 exemptions: In furtherance of the conspiracy…¶
Cheers!¶
Christopher J Dilorio¶
Whistleblower Extraordinaire¶