UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK¶
JANE DOE 43,¶
Plaintiff,¶
-against-¶
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLANE MAXWELL, EM, LESLEY GROFF and NATALYA¶
Defendants.¶
Case No. 17-cv-00616 (JGK)¶
NON-PARTY HADDON & P.C.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE¶
Non-Party Haddon, & EM, P.C. ("Haddon M"), through its undersigned counsel, submits this statement in response to Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Approve Alternative Service filed on January 5, 2018 (Dkt. No. 97) (the "Renewed Motion").¶
Haddon opposes the Renewed Motion to the extent Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Haddon to accept service of process on Maxwell's behalf, or service of other pleadings and documents, in this action or in any other matter. Haddon has not been authorized to accept any such service and objects to becoming the general agent of process for¶
takes no position with respect to Plaintiff's request for an order by this Court deeming the Complaint served on Defendant Maxwell, to the extent based on email transmissions as described in Plaintiff's Renewed Motion and accompanying papers.¶
Dated: New York, New York January 21, 2018¶
SHER TREMONTE LLP¶
By: /s/Kinzo S. Peluso Kimo S. Peluso Justine A. Harris¶
90 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 202-2600 (212) 202-4156 (fax) kpeluso@shertremonte.com¶
Attorneys for Haddon, P.C.¶