## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JANE DOE 43,

Plaintiff,

-against-

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, GHISLANE MAXWELL, EM, LESLEY GROFF and NATALYA

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00616 (JGK)

NON-PARTY HADDON & P.C.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE

Non-Party Haddon, & EM, P.C. ("Haddon M"), through its undersigned counsel, submits this statement in response to Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Approve Alternative Service filed on January 5, 2018 (Dkt. No. 97) (the "Renewed Motion").

Haddon opposes the Renewed Motion to the extent Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Haddon to accept service of process on Maxwell's behalf, or service of other pleadings and documents, in this action or in any other matter. Haddon has not been authorized to accept any such service and objects to becoming the general agent of process for

takes no position with respect to Plaintiff's request for an order by this Court deeming the Complaint served on Defendant Maxwell, to the extent based on email transmissions as described in Plaintiff's Renewed Motion and accompanying papers.

Dated: New York, New York January 21, 2018

SHER TREMONTE LLP

By: /s/Kinzo S. Peluso Kimo S. Peluso Justine A. Harris

90 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 202-2600 (212) 202-4156 (fax) kpeluso@shertremonte.com

Attorneys for Haddon, P.C.