undersigned counsel and pursuant and Directing Pretrial and M following of Defendant/Co to save space is listin questioning objcc Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeff ?Eprn (-Epstein"), by and through his ' aintiff M of this Court's Order Setting Jury Trial edures, hereby objects to certain portions of the deposition designations, and the portions to which he does not object, as nearly all of the to Mr. Epstein was unrelated to this case. scussed fully below. The grounds for the¶
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE hENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA¶
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG¶
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,¶
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,¶
vs.¶
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individual) J. individually,¶
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff,¶
JUDGE: DAVID¶
/¶
Cos¶
EPSTEIN'S OBJECTIONS ' IATIN¶
arch 17, 2010 deposition of Jeffrey Epstein¶
Counsel does not object to the following, relevant portions of Epstein's first deposition:¶
Page 13; Lines 11-21¶
Page 23; Lines 4-19¶
Page 23; Lines 4-19 Page 25; Lines 9-25 Page 26; Lines 6-15 Page 28; Lines 14-25 Page 30; Lines 6-18 Page 33; Lines 1-3 Page 34; Lines 7-22 Page 36; Lines10-25 Page 38; Lines 1-22 Page 48; Lines 13-25 Page 49; Lines 24-25 Page 50; Lines1-4 Page 50; Lines 8-25 Page 52; Lines10- Page 59; Lines 11 Page 63; Lines 4-25 Page 90; Lines 10-15 Page 116; Lines 8-15 Page 120; Lines 16-24 Page 126; Lines 1-5¶
Go¶
Jeff January 25, 2012 deposition of Jeff¶
Counsel does not object to the folio wits.,rel ant portions of Epstein's second deposition:¶
Page 17; Lines 12-15 Page 19-20; Lines 16-25 Lin c*)-22 Page 21; Lines 1-6¶
Epste ects "to the use of any testimony contained in each of the aforereferent itrons that is not listed above, as it is neither relevant to, nor directly wards's causes of action for Abuse of Process and Malicious Prosecution. The non-listed testimony and questioning from these depositions is salacious and replete with inflammatory and unnecessary lines of questioning related to criminal investigations or charges related to Epstein. Allowing the jury to hear this irrelevant portion of the depositions is improper, as it is being offered as "relevant solely to prove bad character" and would unduly inflame and prejudice the minds of the jury against Epstein. § 90.404(2) (a) FLA. STAT. (2013). Epstein further makes his objections to all of the nonlisted Epstein deposition testimony on the following grounds: Relevance; Prejudice; Confusion; Misleading; Impermissible/Inadmissible Character Evidence; Impermissible/Inadmissible Evidence of other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts; and Attorney-Client Privilege. See § 90.403 FLA. STAT. (2013); § 90.502 FLA. STA 3); § 90.404(2) (a) FLA. STAT. (2013).¶
By listing these grounds for objection, Epstein is not w uric-fight to assert additional objections, or objections at trial.¶
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and co cQP f4he foregoing was served, via electronic service, to all parties on the attac S 'Slis, ' " 1st, this October 14, 2013.¶
/s/ Tonja Haddad Coleman¶
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.¶
Florida Bar No.: 176737¶
Tonja Haddad, PA¶
5315 SE 7th Street¶
Suite 301¶
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301¶
954.467.1223¶
954.337.3716 (facsimile)¶
Attorneys for Epstein¶
SERVICE LIST¶
CASE NO. 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG¶
Jack Scarola, Esq. jsx@searcylaw.com; mep@searcylaw.com Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409¶
Jack Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com; smahoney@agwpa.com Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 C¶
"S )¶
Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301¶
J. l= Esq. .Tbra athtojustice.com Jaffe Weissing Edw 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33:¶
Fred Haddatic Dee@FredH dLaw. om 1 Financi Suite 261 Fort L 16, FL 33301¶
Tonja ddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja@tonjahaddad.com; efiling@tonjahaddad.com Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein¶