Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Dec. 1, 2011

Victims' counsel email to prosecutors on discovery demands in Epstein case, Dec. 2011

EFTA00206118

http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell,Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----

From: Paul Cassell

Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:25 AM

To:

(USAFLS)¹;

(USAFLS)¹;

(USAFLS)’

Cc: ‘Brad Edwards’

Subject: RE: Discovery Issues in Epstein

Dear Mr.

We will shortly be filing a motion to compel Government responses to our discovery requests — discovery which, as you know, Judge Marra has already ordered. We realize, of course, that the Government has filed a motion to dismiss/stay. But if the Government’s position is rejected on those motions, then the next issue is what discovery can we expect to receive from the Government.

If the motions are denied, will the Government voluntarily produce anything to us? Will the government at least agree to produce the following:

(1) The Government’s initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26;

(2) Answers to all of the victims’ requests for admission;

(3) All documents, correspondence, and other information that the Government distributed to persons or entities outside of the federal Government or received from persons or entities outside of the federal government; and

EFTA00206119

(4) All documents, correspondence, and other information covered by the victims’ discovery request that is not subject to a claim of privilege.

And, for all other information withheld, will the Government agree to produce a document-by-document privilege log, as required by the local rules?

Thanks for your help on these questions and Brad and I have.

Sincerely,

Paul Cassell

Co-Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

332 South 1400 East, Room 101

Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730

http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell,Paul

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

From:

(USAFLS) ESanchez1@usa.doj.gov