EFTA00206059¶
I recall that most of the victims invoked the NPA provision that required Epstein not to raise the absence of a predicate federal conviction as a defense to subject matter jurisdiction. would know for sure.¶
From:¶
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:31 PM¶
To: [blank], [blank] (USAFLS); [blank], [blank]. (USAFLS)¶
Subject: Re: Jane Does US — Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss¶
Do we have the case numbers of the Jane Does’ civil cases against Epstein? What about the other victims cases? It would be interesting to see if they invoked the NPAs provisions against Epstein.¶
From: □, □ (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 04:26 PM¶
To: , (USAFLS); , . (USAFLS)¶
Subject: RE: Jane Does US — Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss¶
Mid morning is fine for me.¶
From: [blank], [blank] (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 4:20 PM¶
To: [blank], [blank], [blank]. (USAFLS); [blank], [blank] (USAFLS)¶
Subject: Re: Jane Does US — Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss¶
Would mid-morning (about 10:30) work for everyone, or do you have another preference?¶
From: [blank], [blank], [blank]. (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 04:16 PM¶
To: , (USAFLS); , (USAFLS)¶
Subject: Re: Jane Does US — Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss¶
Let me know what time¶
A. AUSA¶