Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · June 12, 2009

Jeffrey Epstein's notice withdrawing most motion-to-dismiss arguments, June 2009

EFTA00183753

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2009

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 09-CIV-80591 - KAM

DOE NO. 101,

Plaintiff,

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendant.

DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWL OF ARGUMENTS I THROUGH VII OF THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DE29)

Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby withdraws arguments I through VII as set forth in the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (FAC) [DE 29], dated May 26, 2009. Defendant withdraws his arguments contained subparagraphs A, B, and Sections I (The Complaint Must Be Dismissed Because Plaintiff Is Not A Minor), II (The FAC Must Be Dismissed Because The Defendant Has Not Been Convicted Of A Predicate Offense), III (Count One Of The FAC Must Be Dismissed Because It Does Not Please A Violation Of 18 § 2422(b)), IV (Count Two Must Be Dismissed Because It Does Not Plead A Violation Of 18 § 2423(b)), (Count Three Must Be Dismissed Because It Does Not Plead A Violation Of 18 § 2251, VI (Counts Four and Five Must Be Dismissed Because They Do Not Plead Violation of 18 §§ 2252(a)(1) Or 2252(a)(1), and VII (Count Six Must Be Dismissed Because 18 § 2252A(g) Was Not Enacted Until 2006).

Defendant will rely only on those arguments set forth in subparagraph D, on page 3, and Paragraph VIII (Any Surviving Count Should Be Merged Into A Single Count) of the

EFTA00183754

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2009

Page 2 of 2

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint Or, In The Alternative, For A

More Definite Statement [DE 29] dated May 26, 2009.

Counsel for Defendant EPSTEIN

Certificate of Service

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of June, 2009

Robert . Josefsberg, Esq.

Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.

Podhurst Orseck, P.A.

25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800

Miami, FL 33130

305 358-2800

Fax: 305 358-2382

Counsel for Plaintiff

Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.

Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.

250 Australian Avenue South

Suite 1400

West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012

561-659-8300

Fax: 561-835-8691

jagesq@bellsouth.net

Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Respectfully submitted.

ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.

ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 224162

rcrit@bclclaw.com

MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.

Florida Bar #617296

mpike@bclclaw.com

BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN

515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

561/842-2820 Phone

561/515-3148 Fax

(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)

Jeffrey Epstein's notice withdrawing most motion-to-dismiss arguments, June 2009

Court filings

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · June 12, 2009

EFTA00183753 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 09-CIV-80591 - KAM DOE NO. 101, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWL OF ARGUMENTS I THROUGH VII OF THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DE29) Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby withdraws arguments I through VII as set forth in the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (FAC) [DE 29]…