Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · June 12, 2009

Jay Lefkowitz letter to federal prosecutors responding to breach notice, June 2009

Epstein's counsel Jay Lefkowitz responds to a prosecutor's breach notice, arguing a Motion to Dismiss did not violate the non-prosecution agreement and noting its partial withdrawal.Machine-written summary

EFTA00183751

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

AND AFFILIATED PARTNERSHIPS

Citigroup Center

153 East 53rd Street

New York, New York 10022-4611

www.kirkland.com

Facsimile:

June 12, 2009

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Ms., Esq.

United States Attorney’s Office

Southern District of Florida

500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Re: Jeffrey Epstein

Dear Ms.

I am in possession of your June 12, 2009 letter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein’s obligations under the non-prosecution agreement. Mr. Epstein’s counsel unanimously determined that the filing of this Motion to Dismiss was not a breach of the non-prosecution agreement, and the Motion to Dismiss was filed by counsel without Mr. Epstein’s final approval.

I want to inform you that immediately upon receipt of your letter, Mr. Epstein directed his counsel to file the attached Notice withdrawing all but issue number VIII of the previously filed Motion to Dismiss. The same issue also is described briefly in subparagraph D on page 3 of the Motion, which likewise was not withdrawn. Please note that this issue relates exclusively to the damages available under § 2255. The Notice has already been filed. If your continued review of the civil dockets causes you to have additional concerns about any other filing, consistent with the notice provisions of the non-prosecution agreement and consistent with our prior practice regarding such matters, please provide me with notice and the opportunity to address the same with you.

I believe that with today’s filing withdrawing these issues Mr. Epstein, through counsel, has fully remedied any perceived breach. Please advise if you for any reason disagree.

Respectfully submitted.

Jay P. Lefkowitz,

Chicago

Hong Kong

London

San Francisco

Los Angeles

Washington,

Munich

EFTA00183752

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

Jay Lefkowitz letter to federal prosecutors responding to breach notice, June 2009

Emails and letters

Epstein's counsel Jay Lefkowitz responds to a prosecutor's breach notice, arguing a Motion to Dismiss did not violate the non-prosecution agreement and noting its partial withdrawal.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · June 12, 2009

EFTA00183751 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AFFILIATED PARTNERSHIPS Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 www.kirkland.com Facsimile: June 12, 2009 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Ms., Esq. United States Attorney’s Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. I am in possession of your June 12, 2009 letter giving notice of breach. I respectfully submit that the Motion to Dismiss that is referenced therein did not constitute a willful breach of Mr. Epstein’s obligations under the non-prosecution …