EFTA00183550¶
Cant make argument¶
back¶
If December wasn’t accepted, then we are¶
ok to October modification.¶
-
more victims - not limited to ones prepared to
name in an indictment
-
waiens right to challenge liability
-
need to pick Special Master
-
if any of Mr. Epstein’s trips to scare
off the selected attorney representative
or Special Master it will be a
breach
-
one week to do submissions to Special
Master, no more lolly gagging
This is a “you reap what you sow” moment.¶
We tried to limit Mr. Epstein’s exposure.¶
We tried to reduce the chance of unsuspectuous¶
attorney trying to take advantage of the¶
publicity and unsophisticated victims.¶
We tried to bring quick, quiet resolutions.¶
You decided that it was in your client’s best¶
interests to roll the dick and go for¶
bake everything and to smear Old Slorman¶
and me in the meantime. Now you have¶
plaintiff attorney holding press conference and victims¶
making much-million dollar leftovers on lots of different courts.¶
If you put that in writing and send it to¶
OPR, I will put it behind me.¶
Black is the only member of Mr. Epstein’s team who has not¶
leveled fake allegations of misconduct¶
EFTA00183551¶
The contents of the letter were clear that is why we were not surprised that council took actions affirming acceptance¶
and his co-counsel¶
Ask that you enter an ore tennis motion limiting Mr. Edwards’ distribution we go to this clients Jane Does 1+2 and co-counsel¶
As clearly stated in the letter,¶
Issue regarding what is the agreement, despite fact that working to resolve that now Mr. Tein filed my Decl. in the civil¶
suits against Mr. Epsleirs in support of their motion to stay the litigation.¶
Names additional persons 6e grand jury Mr. Cassell Mr. Edwards Mr. Lee Judge Marra¶
Filed a case yesterday on behalf of¶