EFTA00183550

Cant make argument

back

If December wasn't accepted, then we are

ok to October modification.

- more victims - not limited to ones prepared to

  name in an indictment

- waiens right to challenge liability

- need to pick Special Master

- if any of Mr. Epstein's trips to scare

  off the selected attorney representative

  or Special Master it will be a

  breach

- one week to do submissions to Special

  Master, no more lolly gagging

This is a "you reap what you sow" moment.

We tried to limit Mr. Epstein's exposure.

We tried to reduce the chance of unsuspectuous

attorney trying to take advantage of the

publicity and unsophisticated victims.

We tried to bring quick, quiet resolutions.

You decided that it was in your client's best

interests to roll the dick and go for

bake everything and to smear Old Slorman

and me in the meantime. Now you have

plaintiff attorney holding press conference and victims

making much-million dollar leftovers on lots of different courts.

If you put that in writing and send it to

OPR, I will put it behind me.

Black is the only member of Mr. Epstein's team who has not

leveled fake allegations of misconduct

EFTA00183551

The contents of the letter were clear that is why we were not surprised that council took actions affirming acceptance

and his co-counsel

Ask that you enter an ore tennis motion limiting Mr. Edwards' distribution we go to this clients Jane Does 1+2 and co-counsel

As clearly stated in the letter,

Issue regarding what is the agreement, despite fact that working to resolve that now Mr. Tein filed my Decl. in the civil

suits against Mr. Epsleirs in support of their motion to stay the litigation.

Names additional persons 6e grand jury Mr. Cassell Mr. Edwards Mr. Lee Judge Marra

Filed a case yesterday on behalf of