Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · Aug. 16, 2013

Privilege log listing OPR draft letters and emails on the Epstein matter

A privilege log from federal court litigation itemizing OPR draft letters and emails, including correspondence from an official to US an official and Paul G. Cassell.Machine-written summary

EFTA00179687

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 67 of 70

Bates RangeDescriptionPrivilege(s) AssertedVictims’ Objections
P-013915 Thru P-013918Counsel, OPR, to Ruth Plagenhoef, Acting Associate Counsel, OPR, Subject: Recommendation, with two post-it notes attached with handwritten attorney notations, and handwritten notations, underlines, and circled text throughout the body of the two page memorandumPrivilege; atty work-productFiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Improper Invocation; Waiver; Final Decision; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. box 3 P-013919 Thru P-013921Draft letter, marked “Confidential”, from Robin C. Ashton, Counsel, Office of Professional Responsibility to Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney, with handwritten corrections, and added textDeliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work ProductInadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue; Waiver; Final Decision
Suppl. box 3 P-013922 Thru P-013924Draft Letter, marked “Confidential”, from Robin C. Ashton, to Wifredo A. Ferrer, with handwritten correctionsDeliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work ProductInadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. box 3 P-013925 Thru P-013927Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten correctionDeliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work ProductInadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. box 3 P-013928 Thru P-013930Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten correctionsDeliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work ProductInadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. box 3 P-013931 Thru P-013933Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten corrections, circled text,Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work ProductInadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor;

Page 66 of 69

EFTA00179688

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 68 of

Bates RangeDescription strikethroughs, and additional textPrivilege(s) AssertedVictims' Objections
Suppl. Box 3P-013943ThruP-013936Draft Letter, marked“Confidential”,from Robin C. Ashton to Wifredo A.Ferrer, with handwritten correctionsDeliberative ProcessPrivilegeAttorney Work ProductAttorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. Box 3P-013943ThruP-013939Draft Letter, Robin C. Ashton toProfessor Paul G.Cassell,withhandwritten correctionsDeliberative ProcessPrivilegeAttorney Work ProductInadequate Log:No Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty:Not in Anticipation ofLitigation;Improper Invocation;OverridingNeed;Claims Against PublicProsecutor;Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. Box 3P-013940ThruP-013942Draft Letter, marked“Confidential:To BeOpened by Addressee Only”,Robin C.Aspen to Wifredo A.Ferrer,withhandwritten correctionsDeliberative ProcessPrivilegeAttorney Work ProductInadequate Log:No Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty:Not in Anticipation ofLitigation;Improper Invocation;Crime-FraudMisconduct;Overriding Need;Claims AgainstPublicProsecutor;Attorney Conduct at Issue;Waiver
Suppl. Box 3P-013943E-mail,Ruth Plagenhoef to LisaHoward,May 5,2011,11:19 a.m.,RE:Re-write of Epstein letters foryour review,with e-mail from Lisa Howard toRuth Plagenhoef(May 5,2011,11:08a.m.),and Plagenhoef to Howard(May5,2011,11:10 a.m.),and HowardtoPlagenhoef(May5,2011,10:41 a.m.) attachedDeliberative ProcessPrivilegeAttorney Work ProductNo Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty;Not in Anticipation of Litigation;ImproperInvocation;Overriding Need;Claims AgainstPublic Prosecutor;Attorney Conduct at Issue;WaiverFinal Decision;Factual Materials
Suppl. Box 3P-013944E-mail,Plagenhoef to Howard,May5,2011,11:17 a.m.,RE:Re-write of Epstein lettyour review,with e-mail from Howard toPlagenhoef(May5,2011,11:08Deliberative ProcessPrivilegeNo Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty;Improper Invocation;Overriding Need;FinalDecision;Waiver

Page 67 of 69

EFTA00179689

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 69 of

Bates RangeDescriptionPrivilege(s) AssertedVictims’ Objections
Suppl. Box 3 P-013945Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:01 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41), attached
Suppl. Box 3 P-013946E-mail, Plagenhoef to Howard, May 4, 2011, 5:01 p.m., RE: draft letters in Epstein matter, with e-mail from Howard to Plagenhoef (May 4, 2011, 10:11 p.m.), attachedDeliberative Process PrivilegeNo Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need
Suppl. Box 3 P-013947E-mail, Plagenhoef to Robin C. Ashton, May 4, 2011, 4:08 p.m., RE: FYI on the Florida matterLaw Enforcement investigatory record, atty work product; deliberative process privilegeNo Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue; Final Decision; Waiver
Suppl. Box 3 P-013948 Thru P-013951E-mail, Paul Cassell to Plagenhoef, May 3, 2011, 12:23 p.m., RE: OPR Inquiry – request for information, with post-it note attached with handwritten attorney notes on telephone call between Plagenhoef and Howard with Dexter Lee and Marie Villafanaaty work product; law enforcement investigatory recordNo Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. Box 3 P-013952 Thru P-013953E-mail, Plagenhoef to Howard and Robin C. Ashton, May 3, 2011, 12:30 p.m.,FW; OPR Inquiry – request for information, with attached e-mails. Handwritten attorney notes on marginaty work-productNo Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. Box 3 P-013952 Thru P-013953E-mail, Dexter Lee to Ruth Plagenhoef, March 16, 2011, 10:52 a.m., RE: Referral of Cassell Request for Investigation, with e-mail from Paul Cassell to Dexter Lee and Marie Villafana (March 15, 2011, 7:21 p.m.) attachedaty-client privilegeNo Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Ordinary Government Communication; No Attorney Client Relationship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl. Box 3E-mail, Plagenhoef to Neil Hurley, OPR,aty work-product, atty-client privilegeInadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings;

Page 68 of 69

EFTA00179690

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 70 of 70

Bates RangeDescriptionPrivilege(s) AssertedVictims' Objections
P-013954 Thru P-013955December 16,2010,10:59 a.m.,FW:OPR Referral - Allegation of Misconduct-U.S. Attorney's Office,S.D.Fla.,with email from Dexter Lee to Plagenhoef(December 16,2010,10:22 a.m.),attached.Handwritten attorney notations.client privilegeFiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Ordinary Government Communication;No Attorney-Client Relationship;Waiver;Claims Against Public Prosecutor;Overriding Need;Attorney Conduct at Issue
Suppl.Box 3 P-013956 Thru P-013846Fourteen(14)pages of handwritten attorney notes on case,telephone interviews with DOJ attorneysatty work-productInadequate Log;No Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty;Material Severable;Crime-Fraud-Misconduct;Factual Materials;Claims Against Public Prosecutor;Overriding Need;Attorney Conduct At Issue.

Page 69 of 69

EFTA00179691

Privilege log listing OPR draft letters and emails on the Epstein matter

Court filings

A privilege log from federal court litigation itemizing OPR draft letters and emails, including correspondence from an official to US an official and Paul G. Cassell.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Aug. 16, 2013

EFTA00179687 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 67 of 70 <table <thead <tr <th Bates Range</th <th Description</th <th Privilege(s) Asserted</th <th Victims’ Objections</th </tr </thead <tbody <tr <td P-013915 Thru P-013918</td <td Counsel, OPR, to Ruth Plagenhoef, Acting Associate Counsel, OPR, Subject: Recommendation, with two post-it notes attached with handwritten attorney notations, and handwritten notations, underlines, and circled text throughout the body of the two page memorandum</td <td Privilege; atty work-product</td <td Fiduciary Duty; Cri…