EFTA00179687

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 67 of 70

<table><thead><tr><th>Bates Range</th><th>Description</th><th>Privilege(s) Asserted</th><th>Victims’ Objections</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>P-013915 Thru P-013918</td><td>Counsel, OPR, to Ruth Plagenhoef, Acting Associate Counsel, OPR, Subject: Recommendation, with two post-it notes attached with handwritten attorney notations, and handwritten notations, underlines, and circled text throughout the body of the two page memorandum</td><td>Privilege; atty work-product</td><td>Fiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Improper Invocation; Waiver; Final Decision; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. box 3 P-013919 Thru P-013921</td><td>Draft letter, marked “Confidential”, from Robin C. Ashton, Counsel, Office of Professional Responsibility to Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney, with handwritten corrections, and added text</td><td>Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product</td><td>Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue; Waiver; Final Decision</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. box 3 P-013922 Thru P-013924</td><td>Draft Letter, marked “Confidential”, from Robin C. Ashton, to Wifredo A. Ferrer, with handwritten corrections</td><td>Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product</td><td>Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. box 3 P-013925 Thru P-013927</td><td>Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten correction</td><td>Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product</td><td>Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. box 3 P-013928 Thru P-013930</td><td>Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten corrections</td><td>Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product</td><td>Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. box 3 P-013931 Thru P-013933</td><td>Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten corrections, circled text,</td><td>Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product</td><td>Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor;</td></tr></tbody></table>

Page 66 of 69

EFTA00179688

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 68 of

<table border="1"><tr><td>Bates Range</td><td>Description strikethroughs, and additional text</td><td>Privilege(s) Asserted</td><td>Victims&#x27; Objections</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3P-013943ThruP-013936</td><td>Draft Letter, marked“Confidential”,from Robin C. Ashton to Wifredo A.Ferrer, with handwritten corrections</td><td>Deliberative ProcessPrivilegeAttorney Work Product</td><td>Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3P-013943ThruP-013939</td><td>Draft Letter, Robin C. Ashton toProfessor Paul G.Cassell,withhandwritten corrections</td><td>Deliberative ProcessPrivilegeAttorney Work Product</td><td>Inadequate Log:No Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty:Not in Anticipation ofLitigation;Improper Invocation;OverridingNeed;Claims Against PublicProsecutor;Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3P-013940ThruP-013942</td><td>Draft Letter, marked“Confidential:To BeOpened by Addressee Only”,Robin C.Aspen to Wifredo A.Ferrer,withhandwritten corrections</td><td>Deliberative ProcessPrivilegeAttorney Work Product</td><td>Inadequate Log:No Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty:Not in Anticipation ofLitigation;Improper Invocation;Crime-FraudMisconduct;Overriding Need;Claims AgainstPublicProsecutor;Attorney Conduct at Issue;Waiver</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3P-013943</td><td>E-mail,Ruth Plagenhoef to LisaHoward,May 5,2011,11:19 a.m.,RE:Re-write of Epstein letters foryour review,with e-mail from Lisa Howard toRuth Plagenhoef(May 5,2011,11:08a.m.),and Plagenhoef to Howard(May5,2011,11:10 a.m.),and HowardtoPlagenhoef(May5,2011,10:41 a.m.) attached</td><td>Deliberative ProcessPrivilegeAttorney Work Product</td><td>No Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty;Not in Anticipation of Litigation;ImproperInvocation;Overriding Need;Claims AgainstPublic Prosecutor;Attorney Conduct at Issue;WaiverFinal Decision;Factual Materials</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3P-013944</td><td>E-mail,Plagenhoef to Howard,May5,2011,11:17 a.m.,RE:Re-write of Epstein lettyour review,with e-mail from Howard toPlagenhoef(May5,2011,11:08</td><td>Deliberative ProcessPrivilege</td><td>No Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty;Improper Invocation;Overriding Need;FinalDecision;Waiver</td></tr></table>

Page 67 of 69

EFTA00179689

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 69 of

<table><thead><tr><th>Bates Range</th><th>Description</th><th>Privilege(s) Asserted</th><th>Victims’ Objections</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3 P-013945</td><td>Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:01 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41), attached</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3 P-013946</td><td>E-mail, Plagenhoef to Howard, May 4, 2011, 5:01 p.m., RE: draft letters in Epstein matter, with e-mail from Howard to Plagenhoef (May 4, 2011, 10:11 p.m.), attached</td><td>Deliberative Process Privilege</td><td>No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3 P-013947</td><td>E-mail, Plagenhoef to Robin C. Ashton, May 4, 2011, 4:08 p.m., RE: FYI on the Florida matter</td><td>Law Enforcement investigatory record, atty work product; deliberative process privilege</td><td>No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Not in Anticipation of Litigation; Improper Invocation; Overriding Need; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue; Final Decision; Waiver</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3 P-013948 Thru P-013951</td><td>E-mail, Paul Cassell to Plagenhoef, May 3, 2011, 12:23 p.m., RE: OPR Inquiry – request for information, with post-it note attached with handwritten attorney notes on telephone call between Plagenhoef and Howard with Dexter Lee and Marie Villafana</td><td>aty work product; law enforcement investigatory record</td><td>No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3 P-013952 Thru P-013953</td><td>E-mail, Plagenhoef to Howard and Robin C. Ashton, May 3, 2011, 12:30 p.m.,FW; OPR Inquiry – request for information, with attached e-mails. Handwritten attorney notes on margin</td><td>aty work-product</td><td>No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3 P-013952 Thru P-013953</td><td>E-mail, Dexter Lee to Ruth Plagenhoef, March 16, 2011, 10:52 a.m., RE: Referral of Cassell Request for Investigation, with e-mail from Paul Cassell to Dexter Lee and Marie Villafana (March 15, 2011, 7:21 p.m.) attached</td><td>aty-client privilege</td><td>No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Ordinary Government Communication; No Attorney Client Relationship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl. Box 3</td><td>E-mail, Plagenhoef to Neil Hurley, OPR,</td><td>aty work-product, atty-client privilege</td><td>Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings;</td></tr></tbody></table>

Page 68 of 69

EFTA00179690

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 70 of 70

<table border="1"><tr><td>Bates Range</td><td>Description</td><td>Privilege(s) Asserted</td><td>Victims&#x27; Objections</td></tr><tr><td>P-013954 Thru P-013955</td><td>December 16,2010,10:59 a.m.,FW:OPR Referral - Allegation of Misconduct-U.S. Attorney&#x27;s Office,S.D.Fla.,with email from Dexter Lee to Plagenhoef(December 16,2010,10:22 a.m.),attached.Handwritten attorney notations.</td><td>client privilege</td><td>Fiduciary Duty; Crime-Fraud-Misconduct; Factual Materials; Ordinary Government Communication;No Attorney-Client Relationship;Waiver;Claims Against Public Prosecutor;Overriding Need;Attorney Conduct at Issue</td></tr><tr><td>Suppl.Box 3 P-013956 Thru P-013846</td><td>Fourteen(14)pages of handwritten attorney notes on case,telephone interviews with DOJ attorneys</td><td>atty work-product</td><td>Inadequate Log;No Factual Underpinnings;Fiduciary Duty;Material Severable;Crime-Fraud-Misconduct;Factual Materials;Claims Against Public Prosecutor;Overriding Need;Attorney Conduct At Issue.</td></tr></table>

Page 69 of 69

EFTA00179691