Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence

Email from petitioners' counsel proposing revised protective order language

Counsel for petitioners proposes revised language for a protective order governing review of Epstein's agreement, citing the government's representations that Epstein is ignoring it.Machine-written summary

First, I don’t know if we’ve been formally introduced. Nice to meet you … electronically at least.

Second, on the language — As mentioned, we need to see this document quite quickly in view of the Government’s representations yesterday that Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement. As a result - and in view of the difficulty of making immediate contact with our clients — I propose one change. Instead of this:

Prior to producing the documents to Petitioners’ counsel, a copy of this Order must be provided to counsel and their clients, who must review and acknowledge their receipt of and agreement to abide by the terms of this Order, and who must provide a copy of that acknowledgment to the USAO.

How about this:

Before counsel for Petitioner’s show the agreement to their clients or discuss the specific terms with them, they must provide a copy of this Order to Petitioners, who must review and acknowledge their receipt of and agreement to abide by the terms of this Order. Counsel for Petitioner’s must promptly provide a copy of that acknowledgment to the USAO.

I assume that the USAO is not concerned about us as attorneys somehow ignoring the Court’s protective order, so this change would focus in on the non-law trained clients.

Ronald M. Boyce Presidential Professor of Law

S. J. Quinney College of Law

University of Utah

332 South 1400 East, Room 101

Salt Lake City, UT 84112

1

EFTA00177405

Email from petitioners' counsel proposing revised protective order language

Emails and letters

Counsel for petitioners proposes revised language for a protective order governing review of Epstein's agreement, citing the government's representations that Epstein is ignoring it.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9

First, I don't know if we've been formally introduced. Nice to meet you ... electronically at least. Second, on the language -- As mentioned, we need to see this document quite quickly in view of the Government's representations yesterday that Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement. As a result - and in view of the difficulty of making immediate contact with our clients -- I propose one change. Instead of this: Prior to producing the documents to Petitioners' counsel, a copy of this Order must be provided to counsel and their clients, who must review and acknowledge their receipt of and agr…