Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · July 7, 2008

Court filing, 2008-07-07

EFTA00177364

Case 9:08-cv-ε-KAMDocument 1Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

08-80736-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.:

IN RE: JANE DOE,

Petitioner.

Emergency VICTIM’S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM’S RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.C . SECTION 3771

COMES NOW the Petitioner, JANE DOE (hereinafter “Petitioner”), by and through her undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim’s Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (“CVRA”), and files this Petition for Enforcement in the above styled action as follows:

  1. Petitioner, an adult, as a minor child was a victim of federal crimes committed by JEFFREY EPSTEIN (hereinafter “Defendant”). These crimes included sex trafficking of children by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, use of a means of interstate commerce to entice a minor to commit prostitution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, as well as wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The Defendant committed these crimes within the jurisdiction of the Southern District of Florida in Palm Beach County, Florida.

  2. Upon information and belief, the Defendant is the subject of a federal criminal investigation conducted by the United States of America in the Southern District of Florida. The Defendant has recently been prosecuted and pleaded guilty, on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County to various similar state offenses including solicitation of minors for prostitution.

  3. Upon information and belief, the Defendant is engaged in plea negotiations with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida concerning federal

1 of 10

1

EFTA00177365

Case 9:08-cv-i

β-KAM

Document 1

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01

B

Page 2 of 10

crimes which he is alleged to have committed against minor children, including the Petitioner.

Such negotiations may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days.

  1. Under the CVRA, before any charges are filed against the Defendant, the Petitioner has the rights (among others) to notice of her rights under the CVRA, to confer with the prosecutors, and to be treated with fairness. As soon as charges are filed, the Petitioner has the rights (among others) to timely notice of court proceedings, the right not to be excluded from such proceedings, the right to be heard at such public proceedings regarding conditions of release, any plea, and any sentence, the right to confer with the attorney for the government, the right to restitution, and the right to be treated with fairness and with respect for her dignity and privacy.

  2. The Petitioner has been denied her rights in that she has received no consultation with the attorney for the government regarding the possible disposition of the charges, no notice of any public court proceedings, no information regarding her right to restitution, and no notice of rights under the CVRA, as required under law.

  3. The Petitioner is in jeopardy of losing her rights, as described above, if the government is able to negotiate a plea or agreement with the Defendant without her participation and knowledge.

WHEREFORE, for the reasons outlined above, the Petitioner respectfully requests this Court to grant her Petition, and to order the United States Attorney to comply with the provisions of the CVRA prior to and including any plea or other agreement with the Defendant and any attendant proceedings.

2

2 of 10

EFTA00177366

Case 9:08-cv-8 i-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07 3

Page 3 of 10

MEMORANDUM

I. THE CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS ACT MAKES CRIME VICTIMS INDEPENDENT PARTICIPANTS THROUGHOUT THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS.

In October 2004, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 118 Stat. 2251 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3771). Because this appears to be the first case involving the Act to come before this Court, a bit of background may be in order.

A. The CVRA Gives Crime Victims Rights to Participate in the Criminal Justice Process.

Congress passed the CVRA “to give crime victims enforceable rights to participate in federal criminal proceedings.” Opinion at 14. Congress was concerned that in the federal system crime victims were “treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were kept in the dark by prosecutors too busy to care enough … and by a court system that simply did not have a place for them.” 150 CONG. REC. S4262 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein).

To remedy this problem, Congress gave victims “the simple right to know what is going on, to participate in the process where the information that victims and their families can provide may be material and relevant … .” Id.

The CVRA gives victims of federal crimes a series of rights, including the right to notice of court proceedings, to be heard at plea and sentencing hearings, and to reasonably “confer with the attorney for the Government in the case.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). Victims also have a “right of access to the terms of a plea agreement … .” In re Interested Party 1, 530 F.Supp. 2d 136, 2008 WL 134233 at *7 (D.D.C. 2008). The CVRA also assures victims broadly that they will “be treated with fairness.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8).

3 of 10

3

EFTA00177367

Case 9:08-cv-1

3-KAMDocument 1Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07

3

Page 4 of 10

Of course, these rights would be of little use to most crime victims unless they were told about them. To ensure that victims are notified of their rights, the CVRA directs employees of the Justice Department “and other departments and agencies of the United States engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime” to use their “best efforts to see that crime victims are notified of … the rights described [in the CVRA].” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1) (emphasis added).1

B. The CVRA Gives Victims Rights During the Investigation of a Crime.

The CVRA gives victims rights during the investigation of a crime. The Fifth Circuit recently reached this conclusion, holding:

The district court acknowledged that “[t]here are clearly rights under the CVRA that apply before any prosecution is underway.” BP Prods., 2008 WL 501321 at *11, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12893, at *36. Logically, this includes the CVRA’s establishment of victims’ “reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(5). At least in the posture of this case (and we do not speculate on the applicability to other situations), the government should have fashioned a reasonable way to inform the victims of the likelihood of criminal charges and to ascertain the victims’ views on the possible details of a plea bargain.

In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391, 394 (5^{th} Cir. 2008).

The position that CVRA rights apply before charges have been filed is consistent with the Justice Department regulations under the CVRA, which explain that government officials “must advise a victim [about their rights under the CVRA] … at the earliest opportunity at which it may be done without interfering with an investigation.” A.G. GUIDELINES FOR VICTIM AND WITNESS

1 Further supporting this requirement is another statute, 42 U.S.C. § 10607(c)(3), which directs government officials to provide victims with “the earliest possible notice of,” among other things, “the filing of charges against a suspected offender.”

4 of 10

4

EFTA00177368

Case 9:08-cv-¹

  • KAM

Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07

3

Page 5 of 10

ASSISTANCE 23 (May 2005). And the plain language of the CVRA undergirds this conclusion, as it applies not simply to prosecutors but to government agencies “engaged in the detection [and] investigation … of crime … .” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1). Indeed, if there were any doubt, the plain language of the CVRA extends victims’ right to situations “in which no prosecution is underway.” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3).

II. PETITIONER IS A “VICTIM PROTECTED BY THE CVRA.

Under the CVRA the crime victim is defined as “a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense …” 18 U.S.C. Section 3771(e). In particular, Defendant called Petitioner when she was a minor over a telephone (a means of interstate communication) requesting that she perform a massage in exchange for payment. As Defendant well knew, that request was fraudulent, as he not only intended to receive a massage, but also intended to have her perform sexual acts in exchange for a cash payment to Petitioner. Only when Petitioner arrived at a Defendant’s mansion as directed by Defendant, did Defendant reveal his true purpose of obtaining sexual favors in exchange for payment. This conduct violated 18 U.S.C. § 2422, which forbids using a means of interstate commerce to knowingly “induce” or “entice” a minor “to engage in prostitution.” In addition, this conduct was both a use of “fraud” to obtain a commercial sex act, in violation of 18 U.S.C § 1591, and use of wire communications to perpetrate a “scheme and artifice to defraud,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

It appears obvious that Petitioner was “directly and proximately” harmed by these crimes, thereby making her a victim under the CVRA. It should be emphasized that the CVRA “was designed to be a ‘broad and encompassing’ statutory victims’ bill of rights.” United States

5

5 of 10

EFTA00177369

Case 9:08-cv-

3-KAM

Document 1

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01

Page 6 of 10

Degenhardt, 405 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1342 (D. Utah 2005) (quoting 150 Cong. Rec. S4261 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein)). Congress intended the CVRA to dramatically rework the federal criminal justice system. In the course of construing the CVRA generously, the Ninth Circuit observed: “The criminal justice system has long functioned on the assumption that crime victims should behave like good Victorian children — seen but not heard. The Crime Victims’ Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the criminal justice process.” Kenna. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it “liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent.” Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be “interpreted liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent”). The CVRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with “fairness.” United States. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005))).

Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its definition of “crime victim” requires a generous construction. After reciting the direct-and-proximate-harm language at issue here, one of the Act’s two co-sponsors — Senator Kyl — explained that “[t]his is an intentionally broad definition because all victims of crime deserve to have their rights protected …” 150 Cong. Rec. S10912 (Oct. 9, 2004) (emphasis added). The description of the victim definition as “intentionally broad” was in the course of floor colloquy with the other primary sponsor of the CVRA and therefore deserves significant weight. See Kenna, 435 F.3d at 1015-16 (discussing significance of CVRA sponsors= floor statements).

6

6 of 10

EFTA00177370

Case 9:08-cv-3-KAMDocument 1Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08

Page 7 of 10

The definition of “crime victims” must thus be construed broadly in favor of Petitioner. She obviously qualifies as a “victim” under the CVRA.

III. PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO NOTICE OF HER RIGHTS, AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONFER WITH THE PROSECUTORS AND TO BE TREATED WITH FAIRNESS.

Because Petitioner is a “victim” under the CVRA, she has certain protected rights under the Act. Most important, the Act promises that she will have an opportunity to “confer with the attorney for the Government in the case.” To date, Petitioner has not been given that right. This raises that very real possibility that the Government may negotiate and conclude a plea agreement with the Defendant without giving Petitioner her protected rights.2

Petitioner is entitled to have this conference with prosecutors before any final plea agreement is reached. The Fifth Circuit reached exactly this conclusion in a very recent case. In In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Circ. 2008), the Government negotiated a plea agreement with the well-heeled corporate defendant without conferring with the victims. When the Government’s failure was challenged in the Fifth Circuit, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Government had indeed violated the CVRA. The Fifth Circuit observed: “In passing the [CVRA], Congress made the policy decision-which we are bound to enforce-that the victims have a right to inform the plea negotiation process by conferring with prosecutors before a plea agreement is reached.”

Id. at 394.

This Court is obligated to protect the rights of Petitioner. The CVRA directs that “[i]n any court proceeding involving an offense against a crime victim, the court shall ensure that the

2 On information and belief, roughly the same crimes were committed against several other young females. These victims, too, are in danger of losing their right to confer under the CVRA.

7 of 10

7

EFTA00177371

Case 9:08-cv-

6-KAM

Document 1

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/0

18

Page 8 of 10

crime victim is afforded the rights described in [the CVRA].” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(b)(1). The CVRA also confers on crime victims the right to “assert the rights described in [the CVRA].” 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(1). Therefore, this Court has its own independent obligation to intercede and ensure that the Government respects the rights of Petitioner under the CVRA.

CONCLUSION

The Petitioner requests the intervention of this Court to ensure that her rights are respected and accorded, as promised in the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.

DATED this 7th day of July, 2008.

Respectfully Submitted,

THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC

Brad Edwards, Esquire

Attorney for Petitioner

Florida Bar #542075

2028 Harrison Street

Suite 202

Hollywood, Florida 33020

Telephone:954-414-8033

| Facsimile: | 954-924-1530 |

| :--- | :--- |

8

8 of 10

EFTA00177372

Case 9:08-cv6-KAMDocument 1Entered on FLSD Docket 07/C98Page 9 of 10

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been provided by United States mail and via facsimile to: ANN MARIE C. VILLAFANA, AUSA, United States Attorney’s Office, 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this 7th day of July, 2008.

Brad Edwards, Esquire

Attorney for Petitioner

Florida Bar No. 542075

9

9 of 10

EFTA00177373

08-80736.Ciy Case 9.08-cy

JS 44 (Env. 2.08)

RRA/JOHNSON

CIVIL COVER SHEET

F1688by10 BJ10 D.C.

ELECTRONIC

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk the civil cocket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-filed

(1. (a) PLAINTIFFS

JULY 7, 2008

In re: Jane Doe

(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Palm Bch.

(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)

DEFENDANTS United States of

STEVEN M. LARIMORE

CLERK U.S. DIST. CT.

S.O. OF FLA. - MIAMI

Law office of Brad Edwards & Associates

2028 Harrison Street

Suite 202

Hollywood, FC 33020

County of Residence of First Listed Defendant

(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT LAND INVOLVED.

Attorneys (if Known)

Ann marie C. Villafaria, U.S. atty’s office

(1) Check County Where Action Arose: MIAMI-DADE MONROE BROWARD PALM BEACH MARTIN ST. LUCIE INDIAN RIVER OKEECHOBEE HIGHLANDS

II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only)

III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff and One Box for Defendant)

PTFDEFPTFDEF
1 U.S. Government Plaintiff3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party)❌ 1❌ 1Incorporated or Principal Place of Business In This State❌ 4
2 U.S. Government Deferant4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)❌ 2❌ 2Incorporated and Principal Place of Business In Another State❌ 5
Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country❌ 3❌ 3Foreign Nation❌ 6❌ 6

IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place on “X” in One Box Only)

CONTRACT

CONTRACTTOBTS
110 InsurancePERSONAL INJury
120 Marine310 A plane
130 Miller Act315 A plane Product Liability
140 Negotiable Instrument320 Labels, Label & Shipping
150 Recovery of Depletion & Injunction of Damage330 Federal Employers’ Liability
152 Recovery of Defined Studiom Laws340 Marine
152 Recovery of Department of Veterans’ Benefits350 Motor Vehicle
160 Snookers’ Suits355 Water Vehicle Product Liability
190 Other Contract360 Other Personal Employment
195 Conduct Product Liability360 Other Personal Employment
REAL PROPERTYCIVIL RIGHTS
210 Land Condemnation441 Voting
240 Foreclosure442 Employment
280 Rent Lease & Ejection443 Housing
245 Ten Product Liability444 Welfare
290 AB Aller Real Property445 Amer. & Disabilities Other
290 AB Aller Real Property446 Amer. & Disabilities Other
290 AB Aller Real Property448 Other Civil Rights
TOBTSFORPRISE/PERSONALITY
310 A plane362 Personal Injury Medication
315 A plane Product Liability365 Personal Injury
320 Labels, Label & Shipping368 Assembled Personal Injury Product Liability
330 Federal Employers’ Liability370 Personal Property
340 Marine370 Tender Funding
350 Motor Vehicle380 Other Personal Property
355 Water Vehicle Product Liability385 Property Damage Product Liability
PRISONER PETITIONS510 Motions to Vacate Sentence
Habeas Corpus535 Death Penalty
548 Mandamus & Other550 Civile Rights
555 Prison Condition555 Prison Condition
FORPRISE/PERSONALITYBANKRUPTCY
410 Agriculture420 Other Food & Drug
420 Other Food & Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 891420 Other Food & Drug
420 R.R. & Truck450 Airline Regs.
460 Occupational Safety Health490 Other
LABORSOCIAL SECURITY
710 Four Labor Standards Act710 Four Labor Standards Act
720 Labor/Mgmt. Relations720 Labor/Mgmt. Relations
740 Railway Labor Act740 Railway Labor Act
791 Emp. Rel. Inc. Securities Act791 Emp. Rel. Inc. Securities Act
IMMIGRATIONFEDERAL TAX SUITS
465 Naturalization Applicant465 Habeas Corpus-Alt Denature
465 Habeas Corpus-Alt Denature465 Habeas Corpus-Alt Denature
465 Habeas Corpus-Alt Denature465 Habeas Corpus-Alt Denature
BANKRUPTCYOTHER STATEMENTS
422 Appeal 28 USC 158422 Appeal 28 USC 158
423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157
820 Copyrights820 Patents
820 Trademark820 Trademark
861 HLA (1935D)861 HLA (1935D)
863 DWC DIWM (4050G)863 DWC DIWM (4050G)
864 SSId Tile XVI864 SSId Tile XVI
865 IRS (4050G)865 IRS (4050G)
870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant)870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant)
871 Third Party 28 USC 7600871 Third Party 28 USC 7600

ORIGIN

(Place an “X” in One Box Only)

  1. Original Procedure ing.
  2. Removed from State Court
  3. Re-filed (see VI below)
  4. Reinstated or Reopened
  5. Transferred from another district (specify)
  6. Multidistrict Litigation
  7. Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judgment

VII. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S).

(See instructions, record pages)

JUDGE

DOCKET NUMBER

Citit the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): Crime Victim’s Rights Act 18 USC § 3771

Partition on behalf of victim of sex offenses to be accrued her rights under the CVRA

LENGTH OF TRIAL via days estimated (for both sides to entire case)

VIII. REQUESTED IN COMPAINTA:

CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION

UNDER F.R.C.P. 23

DEMAND $

JURY DEMAND: Yes No

ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY OF RECORD

DATE

7-7-08

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

AMOUNT 350 ₽ RECEIPT # 724403 IFP

10 of 10

EFTA00177374

EFTA00177375

EFTA00177376

EFTA00177377

EFTA00177378

EFTA00177379

EFTA00177380

EFTA00177381

EFTA00177382

EFTA00177383

EFTA00177384

EFTA00177385

EFTA00177386

EFTA00177387

EFTA00177388

EFTA00177389

EFTA00177390

EFTA00177391

EFTA00177392

EFTA00177393

EFTA00177394

EFTA00177395

EFTA00177396

EFTA00177397

EFTA00177398

EFTA00177399

EFTA00177400

EFTA00177401

EFTA00177402

EFTA00177403

EFTA00177404

Court filing, 2008-07-07

Court filings

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · July 7, 2008

EFTA00177364 <table <tr <td Case 9:08-cv-ε</td <td -KAM</td <td Document 1</td <td Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07</td </tr </table UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80736-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. Emergency VICTIM'S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM'S RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.C . SECTION 3771 COMES NOW the Petitioner, JANE DOE (hereinafter “Petitioner”), by and through her undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim’s Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 (“CVRA”), and files this Petition for Enforcement in the above styled action a…