Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · May 12, 2020

Email on processing Epstein search warrant evidence in an e-discovery tool, May 2020

Email discussing forensic processing of terabytes of Epstein search warrant evidence, including encryption, taint review in an e-discovery tool, and processing delays.Machine-written summary

EFTA00148020

Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents

Just to be clear. The US Attorney’s Office (or it’s contractors) are not “processing” anything. You are taking files that I will be extracting from processed evidence and putting them into an E-Discovery tool (Relativity) to do taint review.

Relativity is NOT forensic tool. It is incapable of dealing with many things that are found forensically on computer like free space, slack space, and system files to name few. When we started this, and you insisted you do the taint review in Relativity, I warned you that it was adding months worth of work on top of what was already done, and that Relativity was incapable of viewing everything. You insisted we do it this way. So now and I have come up with way to fit this round peg into this square hole. We will get it done.

Sorry it has taken so long, but we are talking about terabytes worth of data over multiple forms of digital evidence. Phones, tablets, loose media, cameras, DVRs, servers, laptops, and desktop computers. We have gotten past encryption on multiple devices. When we review devices on such large cases, we usually do it piece by piece as things are processed, I was unaware that you didn’t want to review as things were processed, that you wanted to do it “all at once”, so that added to the delay. Sorry for that. Just differentiation of methodology I suppose.

and I feel confident that the method we have come up with will be more consistent and preserve the attribution of files to devices and links of e-mails to attachments that the load file generation that I did while back was lacking.

Okay, so just to check, you both think that there is not need to do test run? You’re both comfortable with just basically sending us copies of everything? I don’t totally understand why we couldn’t have done that eight months ago, but regardless of the passage of time, I want to make sure we understand so we can report to our supervisors. I assume that means that we (at the U.S. Attorney’s Office and through contractors) will therefore need to do all the processing ourselves, correct? And thanks again to you both.

Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 11:30

Email on processing Epstein search warrant evidence in an e-discovery tool, May 2020

Emails and letters

Email discussing forensic processing of terabytes of Epstein search warrant evidence, including encryption, taint review in an e-discovery tool, and processing delays.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · May 12, 2020

EFTA00148020 Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents Just to be clear. The US Attorney's Office (or it's contractors) are not "processing" anything. You are taking files that I will be extracting from processed evidence and putting them into an E-Discovery tool (Relativity) to do taint review. Relativity is NOT forensic tool. It is incapable of dealing with many things that are found forensically on computer like free space, slack space, and system files to name few. When we started this, and you insisted you do the taint review in Relativity, I warned you that it was adding months worth…