The tag has been added to the database.¶
Thank you.¶
Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity¶
Let’s make this an Issue designation tag, please. That’s where all of our other tags review tags are currently located.¶
Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity¶
Do you want to create a new field that says “Not Epstein Related” or do you want to add this to an existing field (ex. Issue designation). Please note that if you want to add this to an existing field that such as issue designation you should see something that says manage and you can add this tag to that field as well.¶
Thank you.¶
Thanks for your help with this review project. For this batch only, could you please add a tag that says “Not Epstein Related”? Thanks.¶
EFTA00100277¶
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:14 AM¶
Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity¶
Great, thank you! That’s the correct STR.¶
Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity¶
Here is the STR. Please let me know if this is the STR you need.¶
Thank you.¶
Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity¶
Thanks . I think you forgot to attach the STR hits. Mind resending that attachment, please¶
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:08 AM¶
Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity¶
The following is regarding the batches:¶
ATCH003 - USAO-SDFL is all of the data from the following folder:¶
USAO-SDFL Files¶
2020-10-15¶
BATCH004 - OPR Materials is from the following folder and attached STR Hits:¶
EFTA00100278¶
Please let me know if the batches need to be adjusted.¶
Thank you.¶
We’re hoping you can clarify for us the contents of two separate batches on the USvEpstein Relativity database. Batch 003 – USAO-SDFL appears to reference the documents we’ve been talking with and about. Batch 004 – OPR Materials appears to reference the emails that we received from OPR and that you ran the attached search terms through. Is that correct?¶
Thanks very much,¶
EFTA00100279¶