Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · March 15, 2021

Correspondence, 2021-03-15

Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity

Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:05:25 +0000

Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg

Thanks for running this down. Before we dive into batches, I was wondering if we should add an additional tag for this set – something to reflect that the document/email has nothing to do with the Epstein case. Would be potentially helpful in case we ever need to re-review some of the designations.

Confirmed, this is the updated list of search terms. So Batch 4 is indeed the one we need to review.

Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity

Here is the STR. Please let me know if this is the STR you need.

Thank you.

Thanks I think you forgot to attach the STR hits. Mind resending that attachment, please?

The following is regarding the batches:

BATCH003 - USAO-SDFL is all of the data from the following folder:

EFTA00100272

✓ USAO-SDFL Files

2020-10-15

BATCH004 - OPR Materials is from the following folder and attached STR Hits:

Please let me know if the batches need to be adjusted.

Thank you.

We’re hoping you can clarify for us the contents of two separate batches on the USvEpstein Relativity database. Batch 003 – USAO-SDFL appears to reference the documents we’ve been talking with and about. Batch 004 – OPR Materials appears to reference the emails that we received from OPR and that you ran the attached search terms through. Is that correct?

Thanks very much,

EFTA00100273

Correspondence, 2021-03-15

Emails and letters

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · March 15, 2021

Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:05:25 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg Thanks for running this down. Before we dive into batches, I was wondering if we should add an additional tag for this set – something to reflect that the document/email has nothing to do with the Epstein case. Would be potentially helpful in case we ever need to re-review some of the designations. Confirmed, this is the updated list of search terms. So Batch 4 is indeed the one we need to review. Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Here is the STR. Please let me …