Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · April 1, 2020

SDNY prosecutor email analyzing accessory-after-the-fact charging guidelines, April 2020

AUSA email discussing elements and sentencing guideline calculations for accessory-after-the-fact versus misprision charges in a sex trafficking case.Machine-written summary

Subject: accessory

Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:33:58 +0000

Embedded: possible_guidelines_calculation.msg

Just throwing this out there, but accessory after the fact (18 U.S.C. 3) has the following elements:

First, that the crime of [specify crime] alleged in the Indictment was committed by [specify offender];

Second, that the defendant had knowledge of the commission of that crime and [the offender’s] participation in it;

Third, that with such knowledge, the defendant in some way assisted [the offender] with the specific purpose or plan to hinder or prevent [the offender’s] apprehension, trial or punishment.

The punishment is: an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment […]; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.

One-half the maximum term of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking being, of course, a cap of 2.5 years. The guidelines would be higher for accessory than for misprision – it’s the same calculation as obstruction, it goes to 2X3.1 (though really you start at 2X1.1, because conspiracy, but you still end up in the same place), so would be 41 to 51 months (assuming a 3 point reduction for role – or with no role reduction, could be as high as 57-71). Versus closer to something like 21-27 (with no role reduction) or down to 12-18 (with role reduction) for misprision, because it caps at 19 base offense. But also versus a three year cap for misprision.

I don’t have strong feelings about this in any direction, just noticed it while looking for the misprision elements and figured worth mentioning, depending on our views of what the conduct is most appropriately encompassed by.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Southern District of New York

EFTA00088962

SDNY prosecutor email analyzing accessory-after-the-fact charging guidelines, April 2020

Emails and letters

AUSA email discussing elements and sentencing guideline calculations for accessory-after-the-fact versus misprision charges in a sex trafficking case.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · April 1, 2020

Subject: accessory Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:33:58 +0000 Embedded: possible guidelines calculation.msg Just throwing this out there, but accessory after the fact (18 U.S.C. 3) has the following elements: First, that the crime of [specify crime] alleged in the Indictment was committed by [specify offender]; Second, that the defendant had knowledge of the commission of that crime and [the offender’s] participation in it; Third, that with such knowledge, the defendant in some way assisted [the offender] with the specific purpose or plan to hinder or prevent [the offender’s] apprehension, trial or…