EFTA00031887¶
is it the intent to share those? If so, I’ll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it’s unnecessary. I don’t think those are substantive dots but I defer.¶
| From: | (USANYS) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55 | |||
| To: | I < | (USANYS) | |
| Cc: |
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II¶
Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I’m not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be¶
| From: | |
|---|---|
| Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM | |
| To: (USANYS) (USANYS) < | |
| Cc: | |
| Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II |
Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we’ve received, with just a note that it doesn’t appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.¶
thanks,¶
| From: (USANYS) < | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40 | ||
| To: (USANYS) < | >;I | |
| Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II |
— I’ve updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can?¶
I’ve tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks. Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I’ve accurately described/characterized the new stuff we’re looking to share?¶
Thanks,¶