EFTA00031887

is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer.

| From:                                   | (USANYS) |          |  |
|-----------------------------------------|----------|----------|--|
| Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55 |          |          |  |
| To:                                     | I <      | (USANYS) |  |
| Cc:                                     |          |          |  |

Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II

Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be

| From:                                      |  |
|--------------------------------------------|--|
| Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM  |  |
| To:<br>(USANYS)<br>(USANYS) <              |  |
| Cc:                                        |  |
| Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II |  |

Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.

### thanks,

| From:<br>(USANYS) <                     |     |  |
|-----------------------------------------|-----|--|
| Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40 |     |  |
| To:<br>(USANYS) <                       | >;I |  |
| Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II  |     |  |

— I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can?

I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks. Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I've accurately described/characterized the new stuff we're looking to share?

Thanks,