| From: ‘ | (USANYS)“ | |
|---|---|---|
| To: ‘ | (USANYS)” < |
Subject: RE: Epstein forfeiture¶
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:12:43 +0000¶
Probably — although her posture is different now that she is the principal subject; she may think the chances of being charged have gone up and want to talk us out of it.¶
From: (USANYS) c Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 9:06 AM To: (USANYS) < Subject: Re: Epstein forfeiture¶
I can’t conceive of her being willing to come in with no protection at all if she wasn’t willing to come in under a proffer agreement.¶
Sent from my iPhone¶
On Aug 14, 2019, at 9:03 AM, (USANYS) < wrote:¶
He also wants us to reach out to counsel, make clear that the investigation is active and continuing, and either ask if there is any movement on her position/potential for cooperation against others, and/or if she wants to speak to us under an innocence proffer and explain her side of the story, including victimization.¶
| From: (USANYS) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 9:01 AM | ||
| To: (USANYS) | (USANYS) 3 | |
| Subject: Epstein forfeiture |
I ran into Geoff this morning, and he said he’d like to meet this afternoon — I think around 230 or 3, does that work? FYI, he sounds more bullish than I think we were thinking, so there may need to be some expectations managing.¶
Chief Public Corruption Unit United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew’s Plaza t.¶