| From: ' | (USANYS)"   |  |
|---------|-------------|--|
| To: '   | (USANYS)" < |  |

Subject: RE: Epstein forfeiture

Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:12:43 +0000

Probably — although her posture is different now that she is the principal subject; she may think the chances of being charged have gone up and want to talk us out of it.

From: (USANYS) c Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 9:06 AM To: (USANYS) < Subject: Re: Epstein forfeiture

I can't conceive of her being willing to come in with no protection at all if she wasn't willing to come in under a proffer agreement.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 14, 2019, at 9:03 AM, (USANYS) < wrote:

He also wants us to reach out to counsel, make clear that the investigation is active and continuing, and either ask if there is any movement on her position/potential for cooperation against others, and/or if she wants to speak to us under an innocence proffer and explain her side of the story, including victimization.

| From:<br>(USANYS)                        |            |  |
|------------------------------------------|------------|--|
| Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 9:01 AM |            |  |
| To:<br>(USANYS)                          | (USANYS) 3 |  |
| Subject: Epstein forfeiture              |            |  |

I ran into Geoff this morning, and he said he'd like to meet this afternoon — I think around 230 or 3, does that work? FYI, he sounds more bullish than I think we were thinking, so there may need to be some expectations managing.

Chief Public Corruption Unit United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza t.