Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Record

Draft: efta02758087

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 08-80736-CV-MARRA

JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2,

Petitioner, vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the issuance of this Court's Opinion and Order dated February 21, 2019. [DE 435].

The Court clarifies its directive to the parties to confer within 15 days on "how they wish to proceed on determining the issue of what remedy, if any, should be applied in view of the violation." [DE 435 at 33]. The Court did not expect the parties to agree on a remedy. The Court only directs the parties to confer on what submissions or proceedings they believe are necessary in order for the Court to make a determination on a remedy, if any. If the parties are unable to agree on the submissions or proceedings necessary, they may submit separate filings.

DONE and ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Florida, this 22°" day of February, 2019.

KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

All counsel

Draft: efta02758087

Other records

Prepared source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CV-MARRA JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the issuance of this Court's Opinion and Order dated February 21, 2019. [DE 435]. The Court clarifies its directive to the parties to confer within 15 days on "how they wish to proceed on determining the issue of what remedy, if any, should be applied in view of the violation." [DE 435 at 33]. The Court did not expect the parties to agree on a remedy. The Court only directs the parties to …