Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Record

Draft: efta02746353

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/ (consolidated for purposes of discovery)

JANE DOE NO. 2,

Plaintiff, vs.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendant.

/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Motion To Strike Declarations Attached and Cited in Plaintiffs Reply (D.E. #277). Having reviewed the pleadings filed incident to this matter and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that said Motion, (D.E. #277), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS. To the extent Defendant seeks an order striking the declarations said motion is denied. To the extent Defendant seeks an order requiring Plaintiffs to file the missing declarations and granting Defendant leave to file a sur-reply so as to allow Defendant an opportunity to address both the missing declarations and the newly filed declarations, said motion is granted. Defendant has five (5) days from the date of receipt of the missing declarations within which to file said sur-reply.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2009, in at West Palm


LINNEA R. [REDACTED]
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CC: The Honorable Kenneth M. Marra
All Counsel of Record

Draft: efta02746353

Other records

Prepared source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/ (consolidated for purposes of discovery) JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Motion To Strike Declarations Attached and Cited in Plaintiffs Reply (D.E. 277). Having reviewed the pleadings filed incident to this matter and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that said Motion, (D.E. 277), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS. To the extent Defendant seeks an order striking the de…