Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Record

Draft: efta02740232

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/I

JANE DOE NO. 2,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendant.

Related cases:

08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994,

08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,

09-80591, 09-80656, 0940802, 09-81092

![](_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg)

OMNIBUS ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel filed March 6, 2009 (D.E. #54 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #64 in Case No. 08-80381); (2) Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages with Proposed Order filed March 18, 2009 (D.E. #55 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #65 in Case No. 08-80381); (3) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel (D.E. #62 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #72 in Case No. 08-80381); (4) Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed March 2, 2009 ( D.E. #61 in Case No. 08-80381); (5) Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 17, 2009

(D.E. #71 in Case #08-80232 and D.E. #75 in Case #08-80381); (6) Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 29, 2009 (D.E. #79 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #79 in Case #08-80381; D.E. # 43 in Case #08-80993; and, D.E. #33 in Case #08-80994); (7) Defendant's Motion to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel filed May 18, 2009 (D.E. #92 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #94 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #49 in Case #08-80994); (8) Third Party Zinoview's Motion for Protective Order filed November 9, 2009 (D.E. #131 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #132 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #84 in Case #08-80994); (9) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Request for Production filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #59 in 08-80232; D.E. #69 in 08-80381; D.E. #26 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #24 in 08-80994); and (10) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Set of Interrogatories filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #60 in 08-80232; D.E. #70 in 08-80381; D.E. #27 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #25 in 08-80994).

Having reviewed the pleadings filed incident to these matters, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

  • (1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel filed March 6, 2009 (D.E. #54 in Case No. 08- 80232 and D.E. #64 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nunc pro tune;
  • (2) Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages with Proposed Order filed March 18, 2009 (D.E. #55 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #65 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc;
  • (3) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to

Response to Motion to Compel (D.E. #62 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #72 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nunc pro tune;

  • (4) Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed March 2, 2009 ( D.E. #61 in Case No. 08-80381) is DENIED AS MOOT;
  • (5) Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 17, 2009 (D.E. #71 in Case #08- 80232 and D.E. #75 in Case #08-80381) is GRANTED nunc pro tune;
  • (6) Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 29, 2009 (D.E. #79 in Case #08- 80232; D.E. #79 in Case #08-80381; D.E. # 43 in Case #08-80993; and, D.E. #33 in Case #08-80994) is GRANTED nunc pm tune;
  • (7) Defendant's Motion to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel filed May 18, 2009 (D.E. #92 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #94 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #49 in Case #08-80994) is GRANTED nunc pro tune;
  • (8) Third Party Zinoview's Motion for Protective Order filed November 9, 2009 (D.E. #131 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #132 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #84 in Case #08-80994) is DENIED AS MOOT;
  • (9) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Request for Production filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #59 in 08-80232; D.E. #69 in 08-80381; D.E. #26 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #24 in 08-80994) is STRICKEN as a duplicate filing as the identical Motion has been filed correctly in the lead case file of 08-80119

at D.E. #210. An order on D.E. #210 shall be issued shortly; and,

  • (10) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Set of Interrogatories filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #60 in 08-80232; D.E. #70 in 08-80381; D.E. #27 in 08- 80993; and, D.E. #25 in 08-80994) is STRICKEN as a duplicate filing as the identical Motion has been filed correctly in the lead case file of 08-80119 at D.E. #212. An order on D.E. #212 shall be issued shortly.

DONE AND ORDERED this December 16, 2009 ii, at West Palm Beach,

Florida.

LINNEA R. JOH N UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record

Draft: efta02740232

Other records

Prepared source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/I JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 0940802, 09-81092 OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel filed March 6, 2009 (D.E. 54 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. 64 in Case No. 08-80381); (2) Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages with Pr…