Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Record

Draft: efta02750597

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, moves for a default against Defendant, and

would show in support:

    1. Defendant has been avoiding service as detailed in the Affidavit of Service of attached as Exhibit 1.
    1. Mr. effected service on Defendant in a manner authorized by New York State law, and Defendant has failed to timely answer the complaint or otherwise respond thereto.
    1. Defendant is aware of this action and has in fact traveled to visit with Defendant EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach County Jail on several occassions.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter a default against

Defendant

Respectfully submitted,

BY: s/ Isidro M. ISIDRO M. Florida Bar No. 437883 LAW FIRM, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone:(561) 832-7732 Telecopier: (561) 832-7137 e-mail: isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished VIA ECM TRANSMISSION to: Robert D. Critton, Esq. and Michael Pike, Esq., BURMAN CRITTON LUTTIER & COLEMAN, 515 N. Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 this 12th day of June, 2009.

BY:s/ Isidro M. ISIDRO M.

Draft: efta02750597

Other records

Prepared source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, moves for a default against Defendant, and would show in support: - 1. Defendant has been avoiding service as detailed in the Affidavit of Service of attached as Exhibit 1. - 2. Mr. effected service on Defendant in a manner authorized by New York State law, and Defendant has failed to timely answer the complaint or otherwise respond thereto. - 3. Defendant is aware of this ac…