Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Record

Draft: efta02750599

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NO. 09-80469-CIV-MARRa

JANE DOE II,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN and

Defendants.

ORDER OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default against Defendant (DE 37), filed June 12, 2009. The Court has carefully reviewed the motion and the record and is otherwise advised in the premises.

Plaintiff Jane Doe II filed a Complaint against Defendants Epstein and on March 24, 2009 (DE I). The Court has reviewed the affidavit of service accompanying Plaintiff's motion for default against and concludes that Plaintiff effected service on Defendant in a manner authorized by New York state law. See N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 308(4). Defendant has failed to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

I. Plaintiff's Motion for Default against Defendant (DE 37) is GRANTED.

  1. An order of DEFAULT is hereby entered against Defendant =.

DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida,

this 16th day of June, 2009.

KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: All counsel of record

Draft: efta02750599

Other records

Prepared source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 09-80469-CIV-MARRa JANE DOE II, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. ORDER OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default against Defendant (DE 37), filed June 12, 2009. The Court has carefully reviewed the motion and the record and is otherwise advised in the premises. Plaintiff Jane Doe II filed a Complaint against Defendants Epstein and on March 24, 2009 (DE I). The Court has reviewed the affidavit of service accompanying Plaintiff's motion for default against and concludes …