Videotaped deposition of Michael Reiter in B.B. v. Epstein, Nov. 23, 2009

FIL CHAPTER 45 Videotaped Deposition of Michael Reiter in B.B. vs. Epstein, a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein: November 23, 2009 Q: Can you tell us why? A: Well, I felt the handlingway the state attorney’s of unusual. I knew that M about this case. I felt tha felt that the appropriate governed the assignment that his action met the st from the statute in here. A wouldn’t return my phone The detective attempt state attorney’s office, Lai nounce that…and she w the letter in hope that he w realize that his objectivity case and ask the governor like that was necessary for had been submitted to him Q: Could you tell us, explain tivity may be lacking in r other words, what evidenc you felt made it potentially A: Well…when I first told h that it was a serious case, | [and] that the suspect was it. And we were-it was i meeting that he and I we known him to be a victim of children. Well, I know tl statute that addresses tho Q: At some point you sent a letter to state attorney Barry Krischer. Let me show you what we’ll mark as exhibit 3. Let me give you a chance to read through this letter again to help refresh your recollection. A: I’ve read it. Q: At this point, in May of 2006, I’m assuming based on what you told us before that you had had some conversations with Barry Krischer directly…by phone-correct?-prior to this letter. A: I had conversations in person and by phone. Q: Okay. But nonetheless in May-May 1, 2006-you felt the need to write this letter; is that correct? A: Yes. 172 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_009001¶