Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · May 19, 2018

Email from an official to Jeffrey Epstein about Michael Wolff, May 2018

An official agrees to speak off the record with Michael Wolff, and Epstein asks whether a corporation like Trump's lacks constitutional protections from criminal process.Machine-written summary

From: Ken Starr Sent: 5/19/2018 5:07:10 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High Happy to do so. Feel free to give Michael my email address. Hugs, Ken Sent from my iPhone On May 19, 2018, at 10:01 AM, jeffrey E. jeevacation@gmail.com wrote: my good friend michael wolffe of FIre and Fury fame, .wanted to speak to you totally off the record. thoghts? he wanted some color on indicting a sitting pres, between us , he has seen a draft of one. . ) what does not subject to crimnal process mean. ? I assume trump corp has non of the consiutuional baggage?

Email from an official to Jeffrey Epstein about Michael Wolff, May 2018

Emails and letters

An official agrees to speak off the record with Michael Wolff, and Epstein asks whether a corporation like Trump's lacks constitutional protections from criminal process.

House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) · May 19, 2018

From: Ken Starr Sent: 5/19/2018 5:07:10 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High Happy to do so. Feel free to give Michael my email address. Hugs, Ken Sent from my iPhone On May 19, 2018, at 10:01 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com wrote: my good friend michael wolffe of FIre and Fury fame, .wanted to speak to you totally off the record. thoghts? he wanted some color on indicting a sitting pres, between us , he has seen a draft of one. . ) what does not subject to crimnal process mean. ? I assume trump corp has non of the consiutuional baggage?