From: Michael Wolff Sent: 12/4/2018 1:23:53 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High I think it’s a useful point, potentially a powerful one. But I don’t think anything is going to get attention now. I would look for some reporter to do a more nuanced post-morten on the case—with it’s Trump overtones, legal joustings, #metoo-isms, and profit-motives. WSJ is probably right place. On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:59 AM J jeevacation@gmail.com wrote: do you think the press would react to the fact that all the settlement money is going to the attorney and none to the girls.? react to the fact that the case was settled but the lawyers wanted to trumpet their success.¶
Correspondence · Dec. 4, 2018
Email from Michael Wolff to Jeffrey Epstein on press coverage of the case, Dec 2018
Email in which journalist Michael Wolff advises Epstein that a nuanced post-mortem story with Trump overtones would likely suit the Wall Street Journal.Machine-written summary
Email from Michael Wolff to Jeffrey Epstein on press coverage of the case, Dec 2018
Emails and letters
Email in which journalist Michael Wolff advises Epstein that a nuanced post-mortem story with Trump overtones would likely suit the Wall Street Journal.
House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) · Dec. 4, 2018
From: Michael Wolff Sent: 12/4/2018 1:23:53 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High I think it's a useful point, potentially a powerful one. But I don't think anything is going to get attention now. I would look for some reporter to do a more nuanced post-morten on the case--with it's Trump overtones, legal joustings, metoo-isms, and profit-motives. WSJ is probably right place. On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:59 AM J <jeevacation@gmail.com wrote: do you think the press would react to the fact that all the settlement money is going to the attorney and none to the g…
Retrieved from https://epstein-index.org/documents/house-oversight-nov-house_oversight_026328/.