Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Jan. 9, 2015

Correspondence, 2015-01-09

From: Michael Wolff Sent: 1/9/2015 6:33:09 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I’ve just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as “reported fact.” Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it—tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won’t be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, jeffrey E. jeevacation@gmail.com wrote: ______________________. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, ” he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story.

Correspondence, 2015-01-09

Emails and letters

House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) · Jan. 9, 2015

From: Michael Wolff Sent: 1/9/2015 6:33:09 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as "reported fact." Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who …