Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · Oct. 12, 2010

Emails between Paul Cassell and prosecutors on stipulated facts in CVRA case, Oct 2010

Paul Cassell, co-counsel with an attorney for Epstein's accusers, asks prosecutors to stipulate facts; the government declines to concede CVRA violations.Machine-written summary

From: ”

To: Paul Cassell <

Cc: Brad Edwards <

Subject: RE: CVRA case

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:02:27 +0000

Importance: Normal

Judge Cassell,

Please feel free to call me We don’t have any problem with agreeing that a factual assertion is correct if we agree that is what occurred. However, the government does not agree that it violated the CVRA, or that plaintiffs are entitled to any relief.

I will be at the National Advocacy Center in Columbia, South Carolina, from October 17-21. I will have access to my emails but it may be difficult for me to respond quickly to what you send to me. Also, in determining whether your statement of facts is correct, I will need to consult with my colleague who handled the Epstein matter.

From: Paul Cassell [mailto:

Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 3:47 PM

To: [ ] , [ ] (USAFLS)

Cc: Brad Edwards

Subject: CVRA case

Hi (if I may),

I believe we have communicated electronically before. As you probably know, I am co-counsel with Brad Edwards on the CVRA case concerning the Epstein (non) prosecution.

You will have seen Judge Marra’s order today asking for us to explain the current situation on the CVRA case by October 23. By October 23, we plan to file a motion asking the court to declare that there were violations of the CVRA. We will be doing that on the basis of a set of fact in the case, of course.

I am writing to see if you would be interested in working with us on a stipulated set of facts? We will be in a position to give you a set of facts early to middle of next week. Would you be able to look at them quickly and let us know which facts are not dispute?

Thanks in advance for your cooperation on narrowing the factual issues in this case and any idea for helping the case to progress smoothly.

Sincerely,

Counsel for Jane Does

Paul Cassell

Paul G. Cassell

Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law

EFTA00206675

CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.

EFTA00206676

Emails between Paul Cassell and prosecutors on stipulated facts in CVRA case, Oct 2010

Emails and letters

Paul Cassell, co-counsel with an attorney for Epstein's accusers, asks prosecutors to stipulate facts; the government declines to concede CVRA violations.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Oct. 12, 2010

From: " To: Paul Cassell < Cc: Brad Edwards < Subject: RE: CVRA case Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:02:27 +0000 Importance: Normal Judge Cassell, Please feel free to call me We don’t have any problem with agreeing that a factual assertion is correct if we agree that is what occurred. However, the government does not agree that it violated the CVRA, or that plaintiffs are entitled to any relief. I will be at the National Advocacy Center in Columbia, South Carolina, from October 17-21. I will have access to my emails but it may be difficult for me to respond quickly to what you send to me. Also, in d…