Subject: RE: Request for Official Comment on an Investigation¶
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:03:41 +0000¶
Importance: Normal¶
Thank you.¶
From:¶
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:34 PM¶
To: |¶
Subject: FW: Request for Official Comment on an Investigation¶
FYI – second inquiry of the day. I have replied the same to both.¶
From:¶
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:33 PM¶
To: ‘Reeve, Elle’¶
Cc: ¶¶
Subject: RE: Request for Official Comment on an Investigation¶
Hi Elle.¶
Thank you for your email. The USAO cannot comment. It is against DOJ and USAO Guidelines to either confirm or deny the existence of any investigation. Thank you for checking with me.¶
From: Reeve, Elle [mailto:]¶
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:19 PM¶
To: |¶
Subject: Request for Official Comment on an Investigation¶
Hello¶
My name is Elle Reeve and I’m a fact-checker with the news website The Daily Beast. We’re running an article stating that the FBI has re-opened an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, that the investigation has been widened to include Epstein’s associate Jean Luc Brunel plus Brunel’s modelling agency, and that investigators are looking for evidence of child trafficking. Would you be able to give us an official response to these claims?¶
Thank you,¶
Elle Reeve¶
EFTA00206635¶
EFTA00206636¶