Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · July 19, 2010

Joint stipulation and court order on confidentiality of Epstein correspondence, 2010

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAMDocument 214-1Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAMDocument 207Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2010

Page 1 of 5

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 – MARRA/JOHNSON

JANE DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

Joint Stipulation

Plaintiff, JANE DOE and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN (“Epstein”), hereby file their Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Correspondence Obtained By Jane Doe’s attorneys during discovery, and each state:

  1. In July 2010, the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lehrman, PL. (the “Law Firm”), Paul G. Cassell, Esq. and Jay Howell, Esq. (“Counsel”) received through discovery certain correspondence and documents (including content thereof) between Epstein’s attorneys/agents and federal prosecutors (the “Correspondence”).

  2. Counsel for Jane Doe and Counsel for Epstein disagree whether the Correspondence is confidential.

  3. Without in any way altering the obligations set forth in the Addenda to Settlement Agreements entered into in the above-styled matter and in the matters of L.M. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028051 XXXXMB AB and E.W. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028058 XXXXMB AB, Counsel may wish to use the Correspondence in pending cases of Epstein v. Rothstein, CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG and In Re: Jane Does 1 and 2, CASE

1

EFTA00206619

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 207 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2010

If Counsel (or Mr. Edwards as a Defendant in the Epstein v. Rothstein case) desires to file, use or disclose the Correspondence or contents thereof to anyone, Counsel agrees that prior to using any of the Correspondence in these proceedings or prior to providing or making the Correspondence available to anyone else, that they will provide seven (7) days notice to Epstein’s counsel (Robert D. Critton, Jr. at rcrit@bclclaw.com and Michael J. Pike at mpike@bclclaw.com) of their intent to use or provide the Correspondence or in the alternative, file the Correspondence under seal. If Epstein chooses to serve an objection based on a claim that the Correspondence should remain confidential, his objection must be served within seven (7) days from the date of the notice. If Epstein does serve an objection, Counsel (or Mr. Edwards as a defendant) will not file (unless filed under seal) nor disclose the Correspondence to the public or third parties until the court has ruled on the objection. However, Counsel (or Mr. Edwards as a defendant) may file the Correspondence under seal or provide the Correspondence to the court for an in camera inspection if any objection is made such that the court is in a position to rule on the objection.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant requests that the Court enter an order on the above stipulation and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper.

Local Rule 7.1 Statement

Pursuant to the above rule, the undersigned counsel and Plaintiff’s counsel have conferred and have agreed to same.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Robert D. Critton, Jr.

ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 224162

2

EFTA00206620

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010 Page 3 of 5

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 207 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2010 Page 3 of 3

Certificate of Service

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 19th day of July, 2010:

Brad Edwards, Esq.

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL

Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice

Co-counsel for Plaintiff

Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.

By: /s/ Robert D. Critton, Jr. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bclclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bclclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400

3

EFTA00206621

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAMDocument 214-1Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAMDocument 207-1Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2010

Page 4 of 5

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 – MARRA/JOHNSON

JANE DOE,

Plaintiff,

JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

Order Adopting and Entering Joint Stipulation

This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff, Jane Doe, and Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein’s Joint Stipulation, and counsel being in agreement with the entry of the Stipulation, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

  1. The Joint Stipulation is hereby Adopted and Entered.

  2. Without in any way altering the obligations set forth in the Addenda to Settlement Agreements entered into in the above-styled matter and in the matters of L.M. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028051 XXXXMB AB and E.W. vs. Epstein, CASE NO. 502008 CA028058 XXXXMB AB, Counsel may wish to use the Correspondence in pending cases of Epstein v. Rothstein, CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB AG and In Re: Jane Does 1 and 2, CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON. If Counsel (or Mr. Edwards as a Defendant in the Epstein v. Rothstein case) desires to file, use or disclose the Correspondence or contents thereof to anyone, Counsel agrees that prior to using any of the Correspondence in these proceedings or prior to providing or making the Correspondence available to anyone else, that they will provide seven (7) days notice to

EFTA00206622

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAMDocument 214-1Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAMDocument 207-1Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2010

Page 5 of 5

Page 2 of 2

Epstein’s counsel (Robert D. Critton, Jr. at rcrit@bclclaw.com and Michael J. Pike at mpike@bclclaw.com) of their intent to use or provide the Correspondence or in the alternative, file the Correspondence under seal.

  1. If Epstein chooses to serve an objection based on a claim that the Correspondence should remain confidential, his objection must be served within seven (7) days from the date of the notice. If Epstein does serve an objection, Counsel (or Mr. Edwards as a defendant) will not file (unless filed under seal) nor disclose the Correspondence to the public or third parties until the court has ruled on the objection. However, Counsel (or Mr. Edwards as a defendant) may file the Correspondence under seal or provide the Correspondence to the court for an in camera inspection if any objection is made such that the court is in a position to rule on the objection.

DONE and ORDERED this ___ day of ___, 2010.

Linnea R. Johnson

United States Magistrate Judge

Courtesy Copies:Judge Kenneth Marra

Counsel of Record

EFTA00206623

Joint stipulation and court order on confidentiality of Epstein correspondence, 2010

Court filings

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · July 19, 2010

<table <tr <td Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM</td <td Document 214-1</td <td Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2010</td </tr <tr <td Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM</td <td Document 207</td <td Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2010</td </tr </table Page 1 of 5 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 – MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. Joint Stipulation Plaintiff, JANE DOE and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), hereby file their Joint Stipulation Regarding Certain Correspondence Obtained By Jane Doe's attorneys during discovery, …