From:¶
To:¶
Cc:¶
Subject: RE: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein¶
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:36:16 +0000¶
Importance: High¶
Priority: Urgent¶
The FD515 is an accomplishment report. I spoke with and the FBI does not have an objection to releasing the two FD302’s pertaining to Jane Doe’s interviews.¶
AUSA and let me know if we are still in objection to releasing information regarding the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. Also please let me know if you want me to forward you a copy of the FD302’s for Jane Doe.¶
Please discuss with¶
Thanks.¶
Paralegal, FBI¶
From:¶
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:02 AM¶
Subject: FW: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein¶
Attached please find response on the new subpoena. What is the FD515? Thanks.¶
From:¶
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:44 PM¶
To:|¶
Subject: RE: Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein¶
Hi - When it rains, it pours. I am dealing with another Epstein issue now. The investigation is sort of re-opened, we are trying to track down new victims. But, in light of waiver, if the items she requests relate only to if FBI has no objection, then it seems alright to me.¶
Assistant U.S. Attorney¶
From:¶
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 5:28 PM¶
Subject: Fw: Jane Doe v. Jerrrey Epstein¶
EFTA00206552¶
The FBI has received a subpoena seeking documents relating to Jane Doe. There is a Privacy Act waiver attached which was signed by The return date for the subpoena is July 8, 2010. I understand from the FBI that there are two FBI 302’s responsive to the request. There is also an FD515, which the FBI believes is not responsive.¶
Since has executed a Privacy Act waiver, permitting disclosure to , there’s no Privacy Act issue. Does the government have any privilege to assert regarding the responsive documents, e.g. law enforcement investigatory records, etc.? Thanks.¶
From:¶
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 9:59 AM¶
To:¶
Cc:¶
Subject: Jane Doe . Jeffrey Epstein¶
Good morning¶
I faxed over a new subpoena that we received on another Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein case. I faxed it to and asked her if she could assign it to you, since you were the one assigned this matter in the past.¶
I spoke with SA, he advised me that we do have two FD302’s of Jane Doe’s interviews, and an FD515. The FD515 would not be pertinent to their request. However, he suggested to have you contact the criminal AUSA and see what position is on releasing the information requested.¶
can be reached at¶
any assistance.¶
if you need additional information. Please call me if you need¶
Thank you.¶
Paralegal, FBI¶
EFTA00206553¶