EFTA00206411¶
http://www.palmbeachdailynews.com¶
Cox Conserves.¶
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.¶
Contents of this e-mail may be confidential and proprietary. Use discretion when forwarding.¶
No, although I might feel different if it were a pleading. And then again, I might not.¶
Too late… Went out. I don’t think it’s worth resending, do you? I will correct for future use.¶
It just occurred to me that perhaps we should not refer to the Jane Does as plaintiffs since there is no independent civil action, just a motion in a miscellaneous proceeding.¶
From: □, □ (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 5:53 PM¶
EFTA00206412¶
Suggest deleting first sentence (since we are kind of responding)¶
The U.S. Attorney’s Office will file its response to the instant motion in court. However, as we stated more than two years ago in July 2008 in our response to the plaintiffs’ then emergency petition for enforcement of the Crime Victim Rights Act (CVRA), the CVRA was not violated since no federal charges were ever filed in the Southern District of Florida.¶