Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · March 21, 2011

US Attorney's Office draft response to reporter on CVRA motion, March 2011

A reporter's inquiry about the CVRA challenge to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, with drafted US Attorney's Office responses declining comment.Machine-written summary

EFTA00206395

Suggest deleting first sentence (since we are kind of responding)

The U.S. Attorney’s Office will file its response to the instant motion in court. However, as we stated more than two years ago in July 2008 in our response to the plaintiffs’ then emergency petition for enforcement of the Crime Victim Rights Act (CVRA), the CVRA was not violated since no federal charges were ever filed in the Southern District of Florida.

From:Michele Dargan [mailto:]
Sent:Monday, March 21, 2011 4:52 PM
To:(USAFLS)
Subject:Jeffrey Epstein

Hi

There’s been a new court filing in West Palm Beach federal court regarding Jeffrey Epstein. In case # 08-CV-80736, attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and #2 are challenging the validity of the federal NPA, worked out between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal attorneys before he pled guilty to his state charges.

Basically, the attorneys for Doe 1 and 2 are saying the USAO did not notify the victims before signing the NPA, which violates the Crime Victims Rights Act. They are saying that the NPA should be invalidated because of it. They also allege in the motion that the USAO agreed to keeping the NPA secret (it was originally sealed) because of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys and higher ups in the Justice Dept.

I’m reaching out to you for a response to the court filing. I am on deadline with the story.

Thanks, Michele

Michele Dargan

Staff Writer

http://www.palmbeachdailynews.com

Cox Conserves.

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

EFTA00206396

Contents of this e-mail may be confidential and proprietary. Use discretion when forwarding.

Revised response:

It would be inappropriate to comment on the merits of this motion, as the case is pending in court. The U.S. Attorney’s Office will file its response to the instant motion in court. However, as we stated more than two years ago in July 2008 in our response to the plaintiffs’ then emergency petition for enforcement of the Crime Victim Rights Act (CVRA), the CVRA was not violated since no federal charges were ever filed in the Southern District of Florida.

From: Michele Dargan [mailto:]

Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:52 PM

US Attorney's Office draft response to reporter on CVRA motion, March 2011

Emails and letters

A reporter's inquiry about the CVRA challenge to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, with drafted US Attorney's Office responses declining comment.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · March 21, 2011

EFTA00206395 Suggest deleting first sentence (since we are kind of responding) The U.S. Attorney's Office will file its response to the instant motion in court. However, as we stated more than two years ago in July 2008 in our response to the plaintiffs' then emergency petition for enforcement of the Crime Victim Rights Act (CVRA), the CVRA was not violated since no federal charges were ever filed in the Southern District of Florida. <table <tr <td From:</td <td Michele Dargan [mailto:]</td </tr <tr <td Sent:</td <td Monday, March 21, 2011 4:52 PM</td </tr <tr <td To:</td <td (USAFLS)</td </tr…