Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · March 2011

Emails between a Mail on Sunday journalist and FBI about Epstein, March 2011

Mail on Sunday journalist a journalist asks the FBI about pursuing Epstein allegations; the FBI declines to comment, alongside press clippings on Prince Andrew cutting ties with Epstein.Machine-written summary

EFTA00206276

HI Nick.

Thank you for your email. This is always the best way to get me. I am hardly ever at my desk, but always have my blackberry on me.

As to your question, I will not be able to help you. We cannot comment, confirm or deny the existence of any investigation or on our intention to open or close a matter.

Sorry

Thanks

-----Original Message-----

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 3:16 PM

To: [blank], [blank] (USAFLS)

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein|

Dear

I work for the Mail on Sunday newspaper in London, England. The Mail on Sunday last week published an interview with about her time working for Jeffrey Epstein. We plan to publish more revelations this week.

I have been led to believe that the FBI is interested in pursuing the allegations published in the Mail on Sunday - and that Epstein may have committed offences not covered by the non prosecution agreement.

Can you give me any guidance as to whether my information is correct?

You may contact me by email or on

Regards,

Nick Pryer

Assistant Features Editor

Mail on Sunday

This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilities.

Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office:

This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to

EFTA00206277

receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilit!

Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office:

I’m sure u have heard!

From:
To:
Cc: Longa, Waldo
Sent: Mon Mar 07 02:56:29 2011
Subject: FYI
  • This is front page stuff today just wanted to let you know FYI. The Guardian, a London paper, is running articles and alluding to FBI reopening its case.

Prince big mistake: Humiliated Duke of York vows to end friendship with billionaire paedophile

  • Duke now said to recognise friendship was ‘unwise’

  • Former Scotland Yard royalty protection chief: ‘Prince is bringing the royal family into disrepute’

Mistake: The duke has cut ties with the disgraced billionaire

Mistake: The duke has cut ties with the disgraced billionaire

Prince has promised to sever his controversial links with child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

EFTA00206278

The Duke of York has finally admitted that meeting the disgraced billionaire recently was ‘unwise’ and has ruled out further visits to the Florida mansion where Epstein sexually exploited underage girls.

In a warning that may have come from the Queen, the duke’s aides have advised him that his continued association with the paedophile risked damaging the reputation of the monarchy.

Now the humiliated duke, the fourth in line to the throne, has backed down and cut ties with Epstein, 58, in the hope that he can draw a line under the sordid association.

An impeccably-placed source said yesterday: ‘The duke recognises now that the meeting in December 2010, after Epstein’s conviction, was unwise.’

It was not clear last night if a UK trade envoy, has acted before fresh revelations about the friendship are made public.

Earlier this week, in a rare move, his conduct was raised on the floor of the House of Commons.

But, whatever the motivation, his decision to sever ties with an old friend is a tacit admission that he has got it wrong with his choice of friends.

Just what was in the email below. Nothing else.

Can you please call me about this? I am at my desk.

HI Nick.

EFTA00206279

Thank you for your email. This is always the best way to get me. I am hardly ever at my desk, but always have my blackberry on me.

As to your question, I will not be able to help you. We cannot comment, confirm or deny the existence of any investigation or on our intention to open or close a matter.

Sorry

Thanks

-----Original Message-----

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 3:16 PM

To: [blank], [blank] (USAFLS)

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein/

Dear

I work for the Mail on Sunday newspaper in London, England. The Mail on Sunday last week published an interview with about her time working for Jeffrey Epstein. We plan to publish more revelations this week.

I have been led to believe that the FBI is interested in pursuing the allegations published in the Mail on Sunday - and that Epstein may have committed offences not covered by the non prosecution agreement.

Can you give me any guidance as to whether my information is correct?

You may contact me by email or on

Regards,

Nick Pryer

Assistant Features Editor

Mail on Sunday

This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilities.

Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office:

This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any

EFTA00206280

attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilit!

Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office:

From:

Sent:

Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:04 AM

Subject:

Re: Epstein/Conf. Call

If you get a chance, could you send me a copy of the agreement before today’s meeting?

Thanks,

From: . (USAFLS)

Subject: RE: Epstein/Conf. Call

Emails between a Mail on Sunday journalist and FBI about Epstein, March 2011

Emails and letters

Mail on Sunday journalist a journalist asks the FBI about pursuing Epstein allegations; the FBI declines to comment, alongside press clippings on Prince Andrew cutting ties with Epstein.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · March 2011

EFTA00206276 HI Nick. Thank you for your email. This is always the best way to get me. I am hardly ever at my desk, but always have my blackberry on me. As to your question, I will not be able to help you. We cannot comment, confirm or deny the existence of any investigation or on our intention to open or close a matter. Sorry Thanks -----Original Message----- Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 3:16 PM To: [blank], [blank] (USAFLS) Subject: Jeffrey Epstein| Dear I work for the Mail on Sunday newspaper in London, England. The Mail on Sunday last week published an interview with about her time working…