EFTA00206161¶
A. Villafaña¶
Assistant U.S. Attorney¶
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400¶
West Palm Beach, FL 33401¶
| From: | Sheehan, Evelyn B. (USAFLS) |
| Sent: | Friday, December 09, 2011 11:22 AM |
| To: | (USAFLS) |
| Subject: | FW: Jeffrey Epstein lawyers want to depose Scott Rothstein |
Endless…¶
| From: | Evelyn Sheehan [mailto:evelynbsheehan@gmail.com] |
| Sent: | Friday, December 09, 2011 11:20 AM |
| To: | Sheehan, Evelyn B. (USAFLS) |
| Subject: | Jeffrey Epstein lawyers want to depose Scott Rothstein |
http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/PubArticleDBR.jsp?¶
id=1202534991568&Jeffrey_Epstein_lawyers_want_to_depose_Scott_Rothstein=&et=editorial&bu=Daily%20Business%20Review&cn=12.09.11&src=EMC-¶
Email&pt=Daily%20am&kw=Jeffrey%20Epstein%20lawyers%20want%20to%20depose%20Scott%20¶
Rothstein&slreturn=1¶
Jeffrey Epstein lawyers want to depose Scott Rothstein¶
Lawyers for convicted billionaire Jeffrey Epstein will ask a bankruptcy judge for permission to depose Ponzi scammer Scott Rothstein during his two-week deposition beginning next week.¶
U. S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray in Fort Lauderdale set the hearing on Epstein’s arguments.¶
EFTA00206162¶
Epstein, who pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting prostitution following accusations that he had sex with girls, completed his year of house arrest last year.¶
Epstein also is suing Rothstein and former Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler attorney Bradley Edwards for allegedly filing a frivolous case.¶
Rothstein’s deposition begins Monday in Miami and is set to last through Christmas Eve with about 30 lawyers in line to question the former lawyer convicted of masterminding a $1.2 billion settlement financing fraud.¶
Rothstein, who is in protective custody, is serving a 50-year sentence at an undisclosed location.¶
Friday, December 09, 2011 2:09 PM¶
Sheehan, Evelyn B. (USAFLS)¶
RE: Jeffrey Epstein lawyers want to depose Scott Rothstein¶
I know. I don’t think it will ever go away. And I was just telling someone that I don’t really ever want to do a victim case again. Paul Cassell is actually asking for sanctions in a 6th Circuit case against a PSC prosecutor because the Appellate Division in DC decided to take a different position on appeal than the USAO did in the district court and did not confer with the victim. And then, on remand, they are going to ask that same PSC prosecutor to go into court and argue for a $1 million restitution award!¶
A. Villafaña¶
Assistant U.S. Attorney¶
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400¶
West Palm Beach, FL 33401¶