EFTA00206134¶
From: [blank], [blank] (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:00 AM¶
To: , . (USAFLS); , . (USAFLS)¶
Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States¶
Shall we confer briefly at 1:30 to make sure we’re on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards?¶
From: [blank], [blank], [blank]. (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:17 AM¶
To: [ ] , [ ] (USAFLS); [ ] , [ ] (USAFLS)¶
Cc: Greenberg, Benjamin (USAFLS)¶
Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States¶
Yes, I think we need to call him. Do you want to try for 1:30 since we have the time already set aside?¶
A. Villafaña¶
Assistant U.S. Attorney¶
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400¶
West Palm Beach, FL 33401¶
From: [ ] , [ ] (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:15 AM¶
To: [ ] , [ ] . (USAFLS); [ ] , [ ] (USAFLS)¶
Cc: Greenberg, Benjamin (USAFLS)¶
Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States¶
I just received a call from Bentley’s assistant. Bentley is canceling today’s conference call; he is feeling a little under the weather and is not coming into the office today. She told me that he will call me tomorrow to reschedule. Sorry. Given that it is unlikely that we are going to have a substantive discussion with Bentley this week, do you think we should reach out and call Cassell back before the week is over? I admit that thought is also making me feel a little bit under the weather.¶
From: , (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:35 PM¶
To: Bentley, (USAFLM)¶