| Subject: | RE: Re: |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:02:17 +0000 |
| Importance: | Normal |
Nobody knows. At the very first hearing — 3 years ago — the judge said the most he could do is order us outside to “confer.”¶
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:56 PM¶
Subject: Re:¶
What if the court disagrees and says we violated cvra - what’s the remedy? A declaratory judgment? He can’t set the np aside and he definitely can’t get money.¶
----- Original Message -----¶
Sent: Mon Sep 26 15:54:03 2011¶
Subject: RE:¶
Setting aside the non-pros and prosecuting him as though the Non-pros had never been signed.¶
Subject: Re:¶
Suggest what thing?¶
| Sent: Mon Sep 26 15:48:05 2011 |¶
|-------------------------|¶
| Subject: RE: |¶
EFTA00205761¶
No. He already served his sentence in state court and performed all his other obligations under the Non-Pros (including paying damages to 30-some girls). I argued it would be a Due Process violation to even suggest such a thing.¶
Have we conceded that a showing that we violated the CVRA would justify reoopening/setting aside the nonpros?¶
Ideally to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein and then to somehow convince us (probably through public pressure via the press) to prosecute him.¶
What is the relief jane does want in the cvra case?¶
EFTA00205762¶