Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Court filing · Oct. 10, 2011

Victims' motion for extra pages to respond to Epstein intervention briefing, 2011

Unopposed motion by two victims' attorneys for five extra pages to respond to supplemental briefing supporting Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz's intervention motion.Machine-written summary

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson

JANE DOE #1 and JANDE DOE #2

v.

UNITED STATES

JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FIVE EXTRA PAGES TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE BY ROY BLACK ET AL.

COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as “the victims”), by and through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to allow them five extra pages beyond the twenty-page limit to respond to the Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 94) and the government response thereto (DE 100). The motion is unopposed.

In support of the motion, the victims note that initial Supplemental Briefing from Epstein they are responding to (DE 94) is 23 pages long. The Government’s response (DE 100) supports many of Epstein’s arguments and is 11 pages long. As a result, the victims have a total of 33 pages that they need to respond to. The victims require 25 pages to set forth all of their arguments and authorities on the issues addressed in the briefs. The victims have discussed this motion with counsel for Epstein and the Government, and they do not oppose the motion.

1

EFTA00205709

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 2 of 3

CONCLUSION

For all the foregoing reasons, the Court should allow Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 an additional five pages (a total of 25 pages) to respond to the Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 94) and the government response thereto (DE 100).

DATED: October 10, 2011

Respectfully Submitted,

s/ Bradley J. Edwards

Bradley J. Edwards

FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING,

EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

and

Paul G. Cassell

Pro Hac Vice

S. J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

Salt Lake City, UT 84112

Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2

2

EFTA00205710

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The foregoing document was served on October 10, 2011, on the following using the Court’s CM/ECF system:

Attorney for the Government

Roy Black, Esq.

Jackie Perczek, Esq.

Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A.

Miami, FL 33131

Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al.

3

EFTA00205711

Victims' motion for extra pages to respond to Epstein intervention briefing, 2011

Court filings

Unopposed motion by two victims' attorneys for five extra pages to respond to supplemental briefing supporting Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz's intervention motion.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · Oct. 10, 2011

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE 1 and JANDE DOE 2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FIVE EXTRA PAGES TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE BY ROY BLACK ET AL. COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as “the victims”), by and through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to allow them five extra pages beyond the twenty-page limit to respond to the Supplemental Briefi…