Subject: RE: Your response¶
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:01:49 +0000¶
Importance: Normal¶
Attachments: Response_to_Remedies_-MFK-_1-24-2012_639p.docx¶
I don’t think I would do that. Here’s what wrote. undertook to review and edit the section Tuesday night. He just gave me some (3 or 4) minor cosmetic edits. I have never really read it through fully, but I had planned to change the intro to say it is a brief, non-comprehensive treatment of issues the court need not reach. In any event, I have to get on a conference call. Let me know what you think.¶
From: . (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:47 AM¶
To: (USAFLS)¶
Subject: RE: Your response¶
I think I would have to see the rest of the other response first. I might then cut and paste one small portion of it into this response.¶
From: (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:46 AM¶
To: . (USAFLS)¶
Subject: RE: Your response¶
If you have any thoughts, suggestions, additions, etc., I am open to them.¶
From: . (USAFLS)¶
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:38 AM¶
To: (USAFLS)¶
Subject: Your response¶
Hi - Sorry, I just realized that I forgot to respond about your email from last night. I think it looks fine. I am not crazy about the fact that we don’t cite any law, but they don’t cite anything either.¶
EFTA00205493¶
Thank you so much for your help on that case!¶
EFTA00205494¶