EFTA00194688¶
BERT PATTON¶
| From: |
| Sent: |
| To: |
| Subject: |
ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG¶
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:47 PM¶
‘Amy Ederl’; ‘Evelyn Sheehan’; KATHERINE W. EZELL; BERT PATTON¶
FW: Epstein¶
-----Original Message-----¶
From: Roy BLACK [mailto:RBLACK@royblack.com]¶
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:53 AM¶
To: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG¶
Subject: Re: Epstein¶
The client has informed me and I will send you a note today on his position. Sorry for the delay.¶
¶“ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG” RJOSEFSBERG@PODHURST.com 2/6/2009 2:39 PM
Having not heard from you, I assume that you still do not have sufficient direction, or are still lacking client input. I’ve had 3 or 4 issues pending since our conversation of 1/23 or 1/24. I’ve waited two weeks for your responses, and + am running out of time. I understand and sympathize with your situation. I wish someone would attempt to understand my situation. You are leaving me very limited alternatives.¶
| ----- Original Message ----- |
| From: Roy BLACK <RBLACK@royblack.com> |
| To: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG |
| Sent: Thu Feb 05 12:04:21 2009 |
| Subject: Re: Epstein |
I am talking to the client this afternoon. So I have no direction yet.¶
Roy - you wrote on 2/3 that you were advised that “a check went out today”. It did not. This morning 100,000 was wired. There was 200,000 that was more than 90 days overdue. The 50 percent payment is not acceptable. Unfortunately, this matter is going to blow up. My partner, Podhurst wants to bring this to a head by tomorrow. I will try to reach you during the lunch break in my arbitration. You were supposed to get back to me on yesterday - after you received “client input”. I understand your situation - but it is apparent that your client does not care about his agreements, and is. Making everything impossible. I though it was appropriate to let you know before we take further action.¶
----- Original Message -----¶
| From: Roy BLACK <RBLACK@royblack.com> |
| To: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG |
| Sent: Tue Feb 03 13:41:21 2009 |
| Subject: Re: Epstein |
no problem. I will keep you informed.¶
¶“ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG” RJOSEFSBERG@PODHURST.com 2/3/2009 1:33 PM
I’ll be at my arbitration from approx 9 till 6. I’ll try to call you during a break - or you can call me after 6. Why don’t you email me after you get your client input - and I’ll call you after that.¶
| ----- Original Message ----- |
| From: Roy BLACK <RBLACK@royblack.com> |
| To: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG |
| Sent: Tue Feb 03 13:19:40 2009 |
| Subject: Re: Epstein |
1¶
EFTA00194689¶
Bob let’s talk tomorrow. I need more input from the client before we discuss this.¶
¶“ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG” RJOSEFSBERG@PODHURST.com 2/3/2009 1:11 PM
Roy - I’m not satisfied with my last email to you - am in a rush because I’m in an 8 day arbitration. I need to talk to you - will you (at the milt hirsch function tonight) I’ll try to get there btwn 6:45 and 7:30 - if we don’t talk there, please call me after 7:30 - at 632 9230¶
----- Original Message ----- From: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG To: ‘RBLACK@royblack.com’ RBLACK@royblack.com Sent: Tue Feb 03 12:55:53 2009 Subject: Re: Epstein¶
Fine - can we settle it - as to the “delay” in talking about settlement, when I met with Jay L in early Dec he said that Jeff would not be ready to talk about settling till the end of Jan. Both you and Jay did not return my 3 or 4 calls to each of you between Jan 10 and approx Jan 25 when I finally dpoke to you.¶
----- Original Message ----- From: Roy BLACK RBLACK@royblack.com To: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG Sent: Tue Feb 03 12:47:59 2009 Subject: Epstein¶
Bob: I am told a check went out today. I am also told there will be push back on further expenses without a settlement. So we need to discuss settling the cases. Jeffrey will not pay more for the fees and expenses without the start of settlement negotiations. So let’s discuss. Roy¶
2¶