Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · July 21, 2008

Correspondence, 2008-07-21

Federal prosecutors discuss Epstein defense motions for return of property, plans to ignore them, and sending additional victim notification letters through counsel.Machine-written summary

EFTA00193519

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

From:Villafana, Ann Marie C.(USAFLS)
Sent:Monday,July 21,2008 3:53 PM
To:Sloman,Jeff(USAFLS)
Cc:Senior,Robert(USAFLS)
Subject:RE:Epstein

Hi Jeff – Sorry, I wasn’t clear. The notice to the victims doesn’t say anything about the story, it is just the standard notification letter. Goldberger gets a copy of all the letters and I wondered whether, in my cover letter to him, I should say something.

A. Marie Villafaña

Assistant U.S. Attorney

500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Phone 561 209-1047

Fax 561 820-8777

From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)

Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 3:52 PM

To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS)

Subject: RE: Epstein

I don’t think it’s necessary to point out the NY Post article to those victims and in the next breath say that Rubenstein’s statement contradicts the agreement. I think our notice to them should give them some comfort over a tabloid story.

From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 3:47 PM

To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)

Cc: Kuyrkendall, E N. (FBI); Richards, Jason R. (FBI)

Subject: Epstein

Well, our friend Jack Goldberger (probably really Mike Tein) is trying to be very smart.

They have filed a Motion for Return of Property in State Court. The State Attorney will, no doubt, file a response saying, “we don’t have it, the FBI took it pursuant to a federal grand jury subpoena.” Then, Epstein’s folks will either file that response in federal court to show that the federal criminal action is still pending or they will file a motion for return of property in federal court and when we say, “no,” then they will claim that the federal criminal action is still pending.

I plan to ignore it for now.

On another note, I plan to send copies of 11 more victim notifications to Goldberger today. These girls currently are unrepresented. I have redacted their addresses and intend to state in the cover letter that the

426

EFTA00193520

Phone 561 209-1047

Fax 561 820-8777

425

Correspondence, 2008-07-21

Emails and letters

Federal prosecutors discuss Epstein defense motions for return of property, plans to ignore them, and sending additional victim notification letters through counsel.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · July 21, 2008

EFTA00193519 Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <table border="1" <tr <td From:</td <td Villafana, Ann Marie C.(USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td Sent:</td <td Monday,July 21,2008 3:53 PM</td </tr <tr <td To:</td <td Sloman,Jeff(USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td Cc:</td <td Senior,Robert(USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td Subject:</td <td RE:Epstein</td </tr </table Hi Jeff – Sorry, I wasn’t clear. The notice to the victims doesn’t say anything about the story, it is just the standard notification letter. Goldberger gets a copy of all the letters and I wondered whether, in my cover letter to him, I should say something. A.…