EFTA00193310¶
| -----Original Message---- |
| From: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) |
| Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 1:34 PM |
| To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C.(USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) |
| Subject: Re: New proposed response to Jay |
Shouldn’t we formally withdraw the offer as opposed to considering it a nullity?¶
| ----- Original Message ----- |
| From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) |
| To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) |
| Sent: Fri Aug 15 11:55:13 2008 |
| Subject: RE: New proposed response to Jay |
How about a slightly different version:¶
Thank you for your response. Our communications with Roy Black and later with you were solely to determine what Mr. Epstein considered to be the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. We appreciate your answering our question with finality. You have now made clear that Mr. Epstein did not accept the December modification, and accordingly, we will now consider that modification to be a nullity.¶
Pursuant to our Agreement, I will prepare an Amended Notification that contains the name of additional identified victims. In accordance with Paragraph 7B, please provide me with a proposed written submission to the Special Master by Monday afternoon.¶
Finally, as you are aware, yhe United States has been ordered to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement. In accordance with that Order, we will produce the September Agreement with the October Addendum signed by your client. We understand that Mr. Goldberg may not have provided the state court with a true copy of the complete Agreement, and he should take steps to correct that error.¶
| From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) |
| Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11:42 AM |
| To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) |
| Subject: New proposed response to Jay |
189¶