8/15/08 AMCV e-mai re Agrmt¶
EFTA00192825¶
Can’t make argument¶
back¶
If December wasn’t accepted, then we are¶
If December wasnt accepted, then we are to October modification¶
-
more victims - not limited to ones prepared to
-
name in an indictment
-
waives right to challenge liability
-
need to pick Special Master attorney
-if any of Mr. Epstein’s trips to scare off the selected attorney representative or Special Master it will be a breach¶
-one week to do submissions to Special Master, no more lolly gagging¶
This is a ” you reap what you sow ” moment.¶
We tried to limit Mr. Epstein’s exposure. We tried to reduce the chance of unscrupulous attorney trying to take advantage of the publicity and unsophisticated victims. We tried to bring quick, quiet resolutions¶
You decided that it was in your client’s best interests to roll the dick and go for broke everything and to smear Jeff Slorman and me in the meantime. Now you have plaintiffs attorney holding press conferences and victim making multi-million dollar claims on lots of different courts.¶
If you put that in writing and send it to OPR, I will put it behind me¶
Mr. Black is the only member of Mr. Epstein’s team who has not¶
Mr. Black is the only member of Mr. Epstein’s team who has not learled fake allegations of misconduct¶
EFTA00192826¶
The contents of 12/9 Better were clear. That is why surprise we were not taken actions that council acceptance¶
and his co-counsel¶
Ask that you enter an ore tennis motion limiting Mr. Edwards’ distribution We go to this client Jane Does 1+2 and co-counsel¶
As clearly stated in the letter,¶
Issue regarding what is the agreement, despite fact that working to resolve that now Mr. Tein filed my Decl. in the civil¶
Names additional persons 6e grand jury¶
Decl. in the civil suits against Mr. Epdleir in support of their motion to stay the litigation.¶
Mr. Cassell Mr. Edwards Mr. Lee Judge Marra¶
Filed a case yesterday on behalf of S.R.¶