Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search the files
j k
Move through a list of results
[ ]
Previous or next document
g g · G
Top or bottom of the page
Esc
Leave a search field or close this box
?
Show this box

Go to a page: g then

h
Index
t
Timeline
p
People
r
Redactions
x
Explore
w
News
l
Legislation
a
About

Correspondence · July 8, 2008

Prosecutor emails on factors in not disclosing Epstein plea terms, July 2008

Emails between federal prosecutors discussing why Epstein's victims were not notified of his 2007 non-prosecution plea agreement negotiations.Machine-written summary

EFTA00190528

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

From:Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <AVillafana@usa.doj.gov>
Sent:Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:17 PM
To:Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)
Subject:RE: Factors in Not Disclosing Plea Agreement Terms

Hi Dexter – I will forward to you an e-mail that I sent to Jeff and Alex about victim notification during the negotiations. The terms of the agreement were proposed by Matt Menchel, and I worked on drafting an agreement in accordance with those terms.

I think the Office’s position is that the number of victims, timing, and the confidentiality provisions included in the agreement made victim notification impossible. I would add that, after seeing how the defense twisted the disclosure of the terms to the first few victims, premature notification of them would have compromised their trial testimony.

A. Marie Villafaña

Assistant U.S. Attorney

500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Phone 561 209-1047

Fax 561 820-8777

From:Lee, Dexter(USAFLS)
Sent:Tuesday,July 08,2008 12:09 PM
To:Villafana,Ann Marie C.(USAFLS)
Subject:Factors in Not Disclosing Plea Agreement Terms

Marie,

The Attorney General’s Guidelines lists several factors in determining whether to notify a victim of a proposed plea agreement:

(3) Proposed Plea Agreements. Responsible officials should make reasonable efforts to notify identified victims of, and consider victims’ views about, prospective plea negotiations. In determining what is reasonable, the responsible official should consider factors relevant to the wisdom and practicality of giving notice and considering views in the context of the particular case, including, but not limited to, the following factors:

(a) The impact on public safety and risks to personal safety.

(b) The number of victims.

(c) Whether time is of the essence in negotiating or entering a proposed plea.

187

EFTA00190529

(d) Whether the proposed plea involves confidential information or conditions.

(e) Whether there is another need for confidentiality.

(f) Whether the victim is a possible witness in the case and the effect that relaying any information may have on the defendant’s right to a fair trial.

When we spoke this morning, you told me that the initial agreement with Epstein was reached in September 2007. An addendum was negotiated in October 2007. Finally, an additional portion of the agreement was signed in December 2007.

Did we consider these, or any other factors, in deciding not to advise the victims of the plea negotiations, which appeared to have commenced in mid-2007? Thanks.

Dexter

188

Prosecutor emails on factors in not disclosing Epstein plea terms, July 2008

Emails and letters

Emails between federal prosecutors discussing why Epstein's victims were not notified of his 2007 non-prosecution plea agreement negotiations.

DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 · July 8, 2008

EFTA00190528 Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <table border="1" <tr <td From:</td <td Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) &lt;AVillafana@usa.doj.gov&gt;</td </tr <tr <td Sent:</td <td Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:17 PM</td </tr <tr <td To:</td <td Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)</td </tr <tr <td Subject:</td <td RE: Factors in Not Disclosing Plea Agreement Terms</td </tr </table Hi Dexter – I will forward to you an e-mail that I sent to Jeff and Alex about victim notification during the negotiations. The terms of the agreement were proposed by Matt Menchel, and I worked on drafting an agreement in accordance w…