EFTA00189333¶
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)¶
| From: |
| Sent: |
| To: |
| Subject: |
Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)¶
Thursday, February 14, 2008 1:21 PM¶
Richards, Jason R.¶
RE: Epstein Indictment¶
Hi Jason – I didn’t send the indictment yet. I was just asking for input on who to include and who to exclude.¶
How old was Angela Thomas when she went with Ashley?¶
A. Marie Villafaña¶
Assistant U.S. Attorney¶
561 209-1047¶
| From: | Richards, Jason R. |
| Sent: | Thursday, February 14, 2008 1:00 PM |
| To: | Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) |
| Subject: | RE: Epstein Indictment |
Hey Marie,¶
There was no indictment attached to your email. Can you send it again.¶
In addition to the two calls from Sarah Kellen to on her cell phone 4/23/04 at 1:35 pm and 5/2/04 at 10:32 am, we have two telephone calls from Sarah Kellen to Shawn Haught’s (boyfriend) telephone on 03/04/2004 at 9:46 am and 2:30 pm.¶
Message pads reflect 10 messages from beginning 03/11/2003 ending 03/01/2006. Individuals identified as taking the messages are Evelyne, Michael, Louella, and Alfredo Rodriguez.¶
| From: | Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) | [Ann.Marie.C.Villafana@usdoj.gov] |
| Sent: | Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:41 AM | |
| To: | Kuyrkendall, E N.; Richards, Jason R. | |
| Subject: | RE: Epstein Indictment |
FYI – Tell me what you think. Also, can you pull the messages from and see if you can tell what the dates are and who took the messages? Thanks.¶
And am I correct that we have only two phone calls with ? 4/23/04 and 5/2/04¶
A. Marie Villafaña¶
Assistant U.S. Attorney¶
561 209-1047¶
| From: | Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) |
| Sent: | Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:22 AM |
| To: | Braden, Myesha |
| Subject: | Epstein Indictment |
1678¶
08-80736-CV-MARRA¶
P-014608¶
EFTA00189334¶
Hi Myesha – Our server was down for a few hours this morning, so I am very behind on my revisions. I wanted to talk about which girls we should drop.¶
and L. are the girls who have filed lawsuits. I have excluded them.¶
with respect to the other girls brought by here are my thoughts. We can drop and S. very easily. Both only gave 1 or 2 massages and did not disclose their ages. S. is a good witness because she shows that, if you aren’t willing to do more sexual activity, Epstein stops the massage and doesn’t want to see you anymore. She seems like someone whom we could get in as 404(b) because the probative nature outweighs its prejudice.¶
I think we should drop P. because I don’t believe she will ever be completely truthful about the amount of sexual activity that occurred. (She is the girl that one of the witnesses described as “a virgin on graduation day.”)¶
That only leaves , the soccer player who cried for the entire interview. I think that she may be worth keeping. We have such good documentary evidence related to her – message pads, car rental records, 156 calls with Sarah Kellen, and 2 calls with Adriana Mucinska (we have very few phone calls with Adriana, so this is ).¶
What do you think?¶
A. Marie Villafaña¶
Assistant U.S. Attorney¶
561 209-1047¶
1679¶
08-80736-CV-MARRA¶
P-014609¶